Oklahoma Senate Bill SB910

Oklahoma 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/3/25
• Refer: 2/4/25

Caption

Property and critical infrastrcture; creating the Military Installation and Critical Infrastructure Protection Act of 2025. Effective date.

Impact

The legislation is intended to bolster national and state security by preventing potential adversaries from exerting influence on land and assets critical to defense operations. By limiting foreign ownership, particularly in regards to agricultural land, the bill aims to mitigate risks associated with strategic assets that could be exploited during times of conflict. This legislation will modify existing regulations by directly impacting statutes that allow foreign ownership of land and properties in proximity to military assets and critical infrastructure.

Summary

Senate Bill 910, known as the Military Installation and Critical Infrastructure Protection Act of 2025, aims to enhance the security of military installations and critical infrastructure in Oklahoma by restricting foreign ownership and control over specific lands and properties. The bill prohibits foreign principals from countries designated as adversaries from owning or controlling agricultural land and property near military bases or installations. It establishes strict guidelines regarding the divestiture of such properties and holds the Attorney General responsible for enforcing these provisions through court actions if necessary.

Contention

However, the bill has drawn criticism from various stakeholders. Some argue that the severe restrictions on foreign ownership could disrupt agricultural markets and economic development in Oklahoma, leading to unintended consequences for local businesses. Additionally, the definitions of 'foreign principal' and 'foreign adversary' may introduce ambiguity, raising concerns about the enforcement of these regulations and the potential for discriminatory practices against certain foreign entities. The bill's whistleblower provision, offering rewards for reports of violations, has also sparked debate regarding its implications for privacy and property rights.