Oklahoma 2025 Regular Session

Oklahoma Senate Bill SB918 Latest Draft

Bill / Amended Version Filed 02/20/2025

                             
 
SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB918 SFLR 	Page 1 
(Bold face denotes Committee Amendments)  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
SENATE FLOOR VERSION 
February 19, 2025 
 
 
SENATE BILL NO. 918 	By: Bergstrom of the Senate 
 
  and 
 
  Kendrix of the House 
 
 
 
An Act relating to the Administrative Procedures Act; 
amending 75 O.S. 2021, Section 318, which relates to 
judicial review; requirin g certain statutes and rules 
to be interpreted in certain manner; updating 
statutory language; and providing an effective date . 
 
 
 
BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: 
SECTION 1.     AMENDATORY     75 O.S. 2021, Section 318 , is 
amended to read as follows: 
Section 318.  A.  1.  Any party aggrieved by a final agency 
order in an individual proceeding is entitled to certain, speedy, 
adequate, and complete judicial review thereof pursuant to the 
provisions of this section and Sec tions 319, 320, 321, 322 , and 323 
of this title. 
2.  This section shall not prevent resort to other means of 
review, redress, relief, or trial de novo, available because of 
constitutional provisions. 
3.  Neither a motion for new trial nor an application fo r 
rehearing shall be prerequisite to secure judicial review.   
 
SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB918 SFLR 	Page 2 
(Bold face denotes Committee Amendments)  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
B.  1.  The judicial review prescribed by this section for final 
agency orders, as to agencies whose final agency orders are made 
subject to review, under constitutional or statutory provisions, by 
appellate proceedings in the Supreme Court of Oklahoma, shall be 
afforded by such proceedings taken in accordance with the p rocedure 
and under the conditions otherwise provided by law, but subject to 
the applicable provisions of Sections 319 through 324 of this title, 
and the rules of the Supreme Court. 
2.  In all other instances, proceedings for review shall be 
instituted by filing a petition, in the district court of the county 
in which the party seeking review resides or at the option of such 
party where the property interest affected is situated, naming as 
respondents only the agency, such other party or parties in the 
administrative proceeding as may be named by the petitioner or as 
otherwise may be allowed by law, within thirty (30) days after the 
appellant is notified of the final agency order as provided in 
Section 312 of this title. 
C.  Copies of the petition shall be delivered in person or 
mailed, postage prepaid, to the agency and all other parties of 
record, and proof of such delivery or mailin g shall be filed in the 
court within ten (10) days after the filing of the petition.  Any 
party not named as a respondent in th e petition is entitled to 
respond within ten (10) days of receipt of service.  The court, in 
its discretion, may permit other int erested persons to intervene.   
 
SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB918 SFLR 	Page 3 
(Bold face denotes Committee Amendments)  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
D.  In any proceedings for review brought by a party aggrieved 
by a final agency order: 
1.  The agency whose final agency order was made subject to 
review may be entitled to recover against such aggrieved party any 
court costs, witness fees, and reasonable attorney fees if the court 
determines that the proceeding brought by the party is frivolous or 
was brought to delay the effect of said the final agency order. 
2.  The party aggrieved by the final agency order may be 
entitled to recover against such agency any court costs, witness 
fees, and reasonable attorney fees if the court determines that the 
proceeding brought by the agency is frivolous. 
E.  In the interpretation of a state statute, administrative 
rule, or other regulatio n, the reviewing court or officer hearing an 
administrative action shall not defer to the interpretation of a 
state agency and shall interpret the meaning and effect de novo.  In 
an action brought by or against a state agency, after applying all 
customary tools of interpretation, the court or hearing officer 
shall exercise any remaining doubt in favor of a reasonable 
interpretation which limits agency power and maximizes individual 
liberty. 
SECTION 2.  This act shall become effective Novembe r 1, 2025. 
COMMITTEE REPORT BY: COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY 
February 19, 2025 - DO PASS