Oregon 2023 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB2691

Introduced
1/9/23  
Refer
1/13/23  

Caption

Relating to rail transportation; declaring an emergency.

Impact

If enacted, HB 2691 could significantly affect state laws relating to rail operations, particularly concerning safety regulations and emergency management. The proposed legislation intends to empower state authorities to swiftly respond to rail-related emergencies, which may involve enhancing existing safety inspections and implementing new operational guidelines. This will likely lead to a more robust infrastructure capable of handling modern transportation demands, directly impacting local economies that rely on rail systems for goods transport.

Summary

House Bill 2691 addresses issues related to rail transportation and includes a provision for declaring an emergency in certain situations. The bill aims to enhance regulatory measures governing railroads, ensuring higher safety protocols and improved operational standards. Such enhancements are considered crucial for maintaining efficient rail services and addressing safety concerns that have arisen from historical incidents. The text of the bill outlines specific regulatory frameworks intended to bolster the performance and safety of rail transport throughout the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2691 appears to be largely supportive among stakeholders who prioritize transportation safety. Proponents argue that the bill is a proactive measure to prevent accidents, enhance safety measures, and ensure that rail systems can adapt to future demands. However, there may be concerns voiced by some that the increased regulatory oversight could impose additional costs on rail operators, potentially influencing freight prices and service availability.

Contention

During discussions, key points of contention arise around the balance between regulatory oversight and the operational flexibility of rail companies. While safety advocates champion the need for more stringent regulations, industry representatives may contest the extent of new requirements, arguing that excessive regulation could stifle innovation and investment in rail systems. The articulation of emergency declarations also raises questions about the circumstances under which such measures would be invoked, challenging lawmakers to consider how to define and respond effectively to emergencies in a way that protects public interests without overreaching.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

OR SB14

Relating to passenger rail service; declaring an emergency.

OR HB3629

Relating to transportation; declaring an emergency.

OR SB16

Relating to transportation by rail; and declaring an emergency.

OR HB3088

Relating to transportation; declaring an emergency.

OR HB5030

Relating to lottery bonds; and declaring an emergency.

OR HB2793

Relating to transportation; and declaring an emergency.

OR SB1572

Relating to a study on extending the Westside Express Service commuter line to Salem; declaring an emergency.

OR HB3410

Relating to economic development; and declaring an emergency.

OR SB1166

Relating to transportation network companies; declaring an emergency.

OR HB3481

Relating to Oregon railroad rehabilitation; declaring an emergency.

Similar Bills

CA AB2237

Transportation planning: regional transportation improvement plan: sustainable communities strategies: alternative planning strategy: state transportation funding.

CA SB1369

Energy: green electrolytic hydrogen.

CA SB1196

State Transit Assistance Program: eligibility: Anaheim Transportation Network.

HI HB699

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.

HI SB770

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.

CA AB1525

Transportation projects: priority populations.

UT SB0310

Transportation Utility Fee Amendments

TX SB2096

Relating to the creation of and the powers of a comprehensive multimodal urban transportation authority, including the power to impose taxes, issue bonds, and exercise limited eminent domain authority.