Oregon Senate Bill SJR25

Oregon 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/23
• Refer: 1/13/23
• Failed: 6/25/23

Caption

Proposing amendment to Oregon Constitution relating to redistricting.

Impact

If passed, SJR25 will significantly alter the current redistricting process in Oregon by implementing an independent commission responsible for creating and adopting new district maps. This reform is envisioned to prevent the redistricting instances of gerrymandering—where district boundaries are manipulated to favor specific political parties or incumbents. The commission's decisions will be subject to confirmation by the voters during the next general election, thus providing a democratic check on the redistricting process.

Summary

Senate Joint Resolution 25 (SJR25) proposes an amendment to the Oregon Constitution that aims to establish an independent redistricting commission charged with drawing the state's congressional and legislative district maps. This shift is intended to provide a more impartial approach to redistricting by removing the process from partisan legislative control. Under SJR25, the commission, consisting of 36 appointed members, will be responsible for creating district maps that comply with specified criteria, including population equality and preservation of community interests.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJR25 appears to be mixed. Supporters, including various advocacy groups and voters, argue that the bill is a crucial step toward ensuring fair and transparent electoral processes in Oregon. They believe that an independent commission could help restore public trust in the redistricting process. Conversely, opponents express concerns about the potential for bureaucratic inefficiencies and the perceived loss of legislative authority over the redistricting process. Some critics also argue that the amendment could face challenges in implementation, particularly regarding how the commission interacts with existing laws.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the selection process for the commission members and the criteria they must adhere to while drawing district maps. The requirement that commissioners be either judges or appointed individuals with significant knowledge raises questions about representation and inclusivity in the redistricting process. Additionally, some stakeholders worry about the balance of power being shifted too far away from elected officials, potentially diminishing accountability in redistricting decisions.