Oregon 2025 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB3020

Introduced
1/13/25  
Refer
1/17/25  
Report Pass
3/10/25  
Engrossed
3/17/25  
Refer
3/17/25  

Caption

Relating to racing.

Impact

The bill represents a significant shift in Oregon's regulatory landscape regarding animal racing and wagering. By outlawing wagering on dog races, it not only impacts the financial framework that has supported greyhound racing but also prompts consideration for the welfare of the animals involved in such activities. The removal of greyhound racing provisions signifies a broader movement towards safeguarding animal rights, with the Oregon Racing Commission tasked with enforcing these new standards and adapting existing regulations accordingly.

Summary

House Bill 3020 aims to prohibit wagering on dog races in Oregon, effectively making dog racing illegal in the state. The bill amends various provisions related to animal racing laws, notably removing references to greyhounds and other dog racing modalities. The measure is set to become operative on July 1, 2027, providing a transitional period for stakeholders affected by this legislative change. The intention behind the bill is to align state laws with evolving perceptions of animal welfare and the ethics surrounding greyhound racing.

Sentiment

Sentiments regarding HB 3020 are largely positive among animal welfare advocates and some segments of the public who view the ban on dog racing as a progressive step. However, there are concerns from race operators, breeders, and betting establishments who fear potential economic losses and the devaluation of the associated sports culture. The discourse around the bill reflects a conflict between traditional racing practices and contemporary ethical considerations regarding animal welfare.

Contention

Notable points of contention surround the future of the racing industry in Oregon, particularly for those who have vested interests in greyhound racing. Critics argue that the bill may lead to economic downturns for those employed in dog racing and related sectors. Moreover, there are debates on whether the prohibition of wagering on dog races effectively addresses the ethical concerns raised about animal treatment, or if it merely shifts the focus to other forms of betting, leaving some stakeholders feeling sidelined.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AR HJR1019

An Amendment To The Arkansas Constitution To Remove References To Greyhound Racing From Arkansas Constitution, Amendment 100.

TX HB5013

Relating to the Texas Racing Commission and the regulation of dog races, including greyhound races, as live events in this state and of simulcast wagering on greyhound races conducted out of state.

TX HB4115

Relating to eligibility for membership on and the regulation of horse racing by the Texas Racing Commission and a prohibition on the conduct of greyhound or other dog racing as live events in this state; creating a criminal offense; authorizing a fee.

TX HB4757

Relating to eligibility for membership on and the regulation of horse racing by the Texas Racing Commission and a prohibition on the conduct of greyhound or other dog racing as live events in this state; creating a criminal offense; authorizing a fee.

KS SB260

Amending the Kansas parimutuel racing act regarding qualifications for an organization license, the definition of horsemen's associations and horsemen's nonprofit organizations and the distribution of certain tax revenues.

AL SB343

Lowndes County; pari-mutuel wagering; authorized for simulcast past events and live horse and dog races.

TX SB1969

Relating to the nonsubstantive revision of the Texas Racing Act, including conforming amendments.

TX HB2731

Relating to the regulation of historical racing pari-mutuel wagering by licensed horse and greyhound racetracks and the distribution of certain live, simulcast, and historical pari-mutuel pools.