Pennsylvania House Bill HB1341

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/7/23
• Refer: 6/7/23

Caption

In service and facilities, further providing for notices before service to landlord terminated.

Impact

The proposed changes in HB 1341 primarily affect the relationship between public utilities and landlords, enhancing the rights of landlords concerning notification and service termination processes. By obligating utilities to inform landlords of impending service terminations, the bill seeks to protect landlords' interests and improve the management of properties. This alteration to existing laws could lead to more structured communication and expectations between these parties, potentially benefiting tenant experiences indirectly as well by ensuring that service issues are addressed more promptly through enhanced landlord awareness.

Summary

House Bill 1341 seeks to amend Title 66 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes by introducing new stipulations regarding notice requirements for public utility terminations affecting landlords. The bill emphasizes the necessity for public utilities to provide a written notice to landlords at least seven days before any termination of service. This communication can occur via traditional mail, email, text, or other electronic formats, ensuring landlords are informed in advance of potential service disruptions, thereby allowing them adequate time to address any underlying issues that may lead to service termination.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 1341 appears to be supportive among its sponsors and real estate advocates who argue that it provides essential protections for landlords. They believe that by requiring notification, the bill will foster responsible property management practices. However, potential concerns were raised about how the provisions might impact renters, as the focus on landlord rights could overshadow tenant protections. Thus, while there is momentum for its passage, it also serves to highlight the ongoing need for balance in the rights and responsibilities of landlords and tenants.

Contention

One notable point of contention emerges from the potential impact on tenant security and privacy. Critics of the bill might argue that while it emphasizes landlord protections, it risks neglecting the voices and rights of tenants who may also be affected by service disruptions. Furthermore, the specification that landlords must affirmatively consent to electronic communications raises questions about accessibility and inclusivity, particularly for landlords who may not be as technologically connected. This tension points to a broader debate about how best to regulate the responsibilities of public utilities while ensuring that both tenants and landlords are treated fairly.