Pennsylvania House Bill HB1685

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/19/23
• Refer: 9/19/23
• Refer: 7/2/24
• Report Pass: 7/3/24
• Engrossed: 7/3/24
• Refer: 7/12/24

Caption

In certification of teachers, repealing provisions relating to CPR instruction; and, in school health services, repealing provisions relating to automatic external defibrillators and providing for AED and CPR instruction and procedure, for Automated External Defibrillator Program and for availability and specifications of automated external defibrillators.

Impact

The bill introduces significant changes to how schools within Pennsylvania approach cardiac emergencies by ensuring regular training in CPR and the proper use of AEDs. The requirements extend to all school entities, nonpublic schools, and private schools, emphasizing the provision of AEDs that meet health department specifications and the establishment of a comprehensive emergency plan. As a result, educational institutions will be better prepared to respond to medical emergencies, potentially improving student safety and health outcomes.

Summary

House Bill 1685 amends the Pennsylvania Public School Code with a focus on enhancing the safety and well-being of students during school activities. Specifically, it repeals previous provisions regarding the instruction of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and the requirements surrounding automated external defibrillators (AEDs). HB1685 establishes a more structured program for AED availability and CPR training, mandating that schools ensure staff are certified and trained to respond to cardiac emergencies. This includes having an AED accessible during athletic activities and maintaining a cardiac emergency response plan that incorporates guidelines for potential cardiac incidents on campus.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB1685 is generally positive, as stakeholders recognize the value of increased preparedness in dealing with sudden cardiac events. Supporters argue that these measures are essential for ensuring student safety during school-sponsored activities, particularly sports. However, some concerns exist regarding the financial implications of ensuring compliance with the new requirements, especially for smaller or underfunded schools that may struggle to acquire adequate resources for training and equipment.

Contention

Notably, while the bill is aimed at improving health and safety in schools, there is contention over the mandated requirements and the potential financial burden on school districts, particularly those with fewer resources. Critics argue that the emphasis on mandatory situational training and equipment could lead to disparities between well-funded districts and those less equipped. Furthermore, the requirement for an annual review and updates to emergency response plans adds an administrative layer that some educators may find burdensome, raising questions about operational feasibility.