Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

Pennsylvania House Bill HB2314

Introduced
5/21/24  
Refer
5/21/24  
Refer
6/24/24  

Caption

In fiscal affairs, further providing for establishment and use of Game Fund and for appropriation and audit of moneys.

Impact

The bill's amendments will significantly influence how the Game Fund's financial resources are managed and audited. By requiring an annual review and the submission of budget recommendations to the Senate and House Appropriations Committee, the legislation imposes a structured approach to financial oversight. This move aims to bolster public confidence in how state funds are utilized and ensure that resources are directed towards purposes that align with legislative intent. The prohibition against using the Game Fund for alcoholic beverages additionally reflects a focus on responsible spending and ethical governance.

Summary

House Bill 2314 seeks to amend Title 34 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, specifically addressing the fiscal management of the Game Fund. The bill establishes guidelines for the appropriation and audit of moneys allocated to the Game Commission, enhancing legislative scrutiny and transparency regarding the utilization of these funds. Importantly, the legislation prohibits the use of any funds from the Game Fund for the purchase of alcoholic beverages, reinforcing a commitment to responsible fiscal practices within state-operated programs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2314 is largely positive, with broad support from legislators who emphasize the importance of fiscal responsibility and accountability. The clarity that the bill brings to the regulations governing the Game Fund aligns with ongoing efforts to improve the financial oversight of state resources. However, there may be concerns raised by some stakeholders regarding the limitations on fund usage, particularly if they perceive it as restricting flexibility in budget management.

Contention

While the bill has garnered significant support, debates could arise regarding the implications of strictly prohibiting specific types of expenditures from the Game Fund. Critics might argue that more nuanced guidelines could provide flexibility in fund management, which could be essential in unforeseen circumstances. Nonetheless, proponents view the bill as a necessary step towards improving governance and ensuring that public funds are managed in an ethically sound manner.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.