In Department of Aging, further providing for evaluation.
Impact
This legislation is expected to enhance public accountability and transparency concerning services offered to older residents of Pennsylvania. By requiring regular evaluations and compliance reports, the bill aims to ensure that area agencies are meeting the needs of their clientele effectively and efficiently. The focus on evaluation may lead to improvements in service delivery, promoting better outcomes for the elderly population in the state.
Summary
House Bill 2319 seeks to amend the Administrative Code of 1929, specifically focusing on the Department of Aging. The bill outlines a framework for evaluating the activities of area agencies that provide services to older adults. One of its major provisions is that the Department of Aging will be responsible for conducting annual evaluations of these agencies, assessing their compliance with established standards and the effectiveness of their programs. Furthermore, the bill mandates that a written compliance report be submitted and made publicly accessible within thirty days of the evaluation.
Sentiment
Discussions surrounding HB 2319 indicate a supportive sentiment for the need for evaluation and accountability in programs targeted at older adults. Legislators and advocacy groups representing senior interests seem to view this initiative as a positive step forward in ensuring that services are not only compliant with regulations but also of high quality. However, there may also be skepticism regarding potential bureaucratic burdens imposed on area agencies as a result of the additional reporting requirements.
Contention
Notable points of contention may arise from concerns about the administrative burden placed on area agencies due to the mandated evaluations and reporting requirements. Some legislators and stakeholders may argue that the bill could divert resources away from direct services provided to older persons towards compliance activities. As with many changes in policy, balancing the need for accountability with the availability of resources for service delivery is likely to be a focal point of ongoing discussions.
In powers and duties in general, further providing for departmental reports; in COVID-19 record retention, further providing for retention of records related to COVID-19; and making an editorial change.
In powers and duties of the Department of Labor and Industry, its departmental administrative and advisory boards and departmental administrative officers, further providing for Elevator Safety Board.
In powers and duties of the Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs, further providing for powers and duties and providing for regulatory flexibility during opioid epidemic.
In administrative organization, further providing for departmental administrative boards, commissions, and offices; in organization of departmental administrative boards and commissions and of advisory boards and commissions, further providing for advisory boards and commissions and repealing provisions relating to Environmental Quality Board; in powers and duties of the Department of Agriculture and its departmental administrative commission, further providing for seasonal farm labor; in powers and duties of the Department of Environmental Resources, its officers and departmental and advisory boards and commissions, further providing for Environmental Quality Board and for powers of Environmental Quality Board.
In powers and duties of the Department of Health and its departmental administrative and advisory boards, further providing for Advisory Health Board; and abrogating a regulation.