Pennsylvania House Bill HB707

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/27/23
• Refer: 3/27/23

Caption

In preliminary provisions, providing for the Environmental Justice Advisory Board.

Impact

The implementation of HB 707 will have implications for environmental policy-making in Pennsylvania by formalizing a structure for community involvement in environmental justice matters. The board will meet quarterly and is required to record and maintain minutes of all meetings, thereby ensuring transparency in its operations. This structure aims to enhance accountability and inclusion in environmental governance, making it crucial for the state's approach to addressing the environmental challenges faced by marginalized communities.

Summary

House Bill 707 establishes the Environmental Justice Advisory Board in Pennsylvania. This board is tasked with the recommendation of rules, regulations, and procedures necessary to advance the state's environmental justice programs. It seeks to include a diverse range of members from low-income and minority communities, regulated entities, local governments, environmentalists, academia, and industry to ensure a broad representation of interests in environmental decision-making. The board is designed to operate under the Department of Environmental Protection, providing crucial oversight on environmental policies affecting vulnerable communities.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 707 appears to be generally positive among stakeholders advocating for increased environmental justice. Supporters view the establishment of the advisory board as a significant step toward addressing historical inequalities in environmental policy and ensuring that impacted communities have a voice in the regulatory process. However, there may be some contention regarding the effectiveness of such boards in enacting real change, particularly from those skeptical about regulatory bodies’ ability to address deeply entrenched issues.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the representation and effectiveness of the Environmental Justice Advisory Board. Critics may question the inclusivity of board appointments and whether it will indeed reflect the true voices of marginalized communities. Additionally, debates may surface concerning the board's authority relative to existing regulations and whether its recommendations will lead to tangible improvements in environmental justice. Ensuring that the board fulfills its intended role without bureaucratic overreach will be crucial for its success.