Pennsylvania House Bill HB782

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/30/23
• Refer: 3/30/23
• Refer: 6/26/24
• Report Pass: 9/23/24

Caption

In subdivision and land development, providing for potentially impacted municipalities and further providing for approval of plats and for completion of improvements or guarantee thereof prerequisite to final plat approval; providing for developments of regional significance and impact; and, in zoning hearing board and other administrative proceedings, further providing for jurisdiction.

Impact

The legislation is projected to improve coordination between municipalities regarding land development, allowing for better planning and implementation of infrastructure to support new developments. By requiring impact analyses, municipalities can address concerns about traffic congestion, environmental degradation, and local service strains proactively. Supporters argue this will lead to more sustainable and considerate urban development, preventing unforeseen adverse effects on communities that are often overburdened by large scale developments.

Summary

House Bill 782 aims to amend the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code to enhance the governance and regulation of land development, focusing on developments of regional significance and their impacts on contiguous municipalities. The bill introduces requirements for municipalities to notify potentially affected parties within a specified timeframe, as well as mandates comprehensive impact analyses on proposed developments that could significantly affect local communities. This includes assessments of traffic, environmental resources, and social impacts.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 782 appears largely positive among local government officials and urban planners who see it as a necessary tool for effective land use management. Community advocates, however, express concerns that the bill may not go far enough in protecting municipal interests against larger developers. They highlight the need for thorough oversight and the potential for local voices to be overlooked in the development approval process, especially for developments of regional significance.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the adequacy of the proposed timelines for notification and analysis. Critics have argued that the 10-day notice requirement for impacted municipalities may not provide sufficient time for adequate review and response, which could lead to rushed decisions on significant developments. Additionally, there are concerns regarding the financial burden that the requirement for impact analyses may impose on smaller municipalities, potentially exceeding their administrative capabilities.