Pennsylvania House Bill HB88

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/7/23
• Refer: 3/7/23
• Refer: 5/3/23
• Refer: 6/14/23
• Report Pass: 9/22/23
• Refer: 9/22/23

Caption

In legal advertising, providing for redundant advertising on Internet by political subdivisions or municipal authorities; and, in open meetings, further providing for public notice.

Impact

The implications of HB88 are significant, primarily affecting laws related to legal advertising and the requirements for public notice in open meetings. By formalizing the use of the Internet for such announcements, the bill aims to make information more accessible, especially for those who may not have direct exposure to traditional forms of legal advertising. This change can also lead to cost savings for local governments, as they may find digital platforms a more economical means of reaching their constituents.

Summary

House Bill 88 focuses on enhancing transparency in legal advertising and open meetings conducted by political subdivisions or municipal authorities. The bill proposes provisions for redundant advertising on the Internet to ensure that legal notices reach a wider audience, thereby promoting public awareness and engagement in governmental practices. The intent is to modernize the way public notices are disseminated, reflecting the shift toward digital communication in the age of the internet.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB88 appears supportive, as there seems to be a consensus on the necessity of updating the framework for legal advertising to keep pace with technological advancements. Stakeholders, including legislative members from the House Local Government Committee, expressed optimism that the bill would not only enhance public notification but also streamline processes for municipalities, fostering greater community participation in governance.

Contention

While no major points of contention have been highlighted in the discussions or voting history for HB88, the transition to digital means of advertising may raise questions about accessibility and inclusivity. Opponents may contend that certain demographic groups could be inadvertently left out if they lack internet access or familiarity with online platforms. Nevertheless, the overwhelmingly positive vote of 21-0 in the committee suggests broad bipartisan support for the bill.