Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB40

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/12/25
• Refer: 5/12/25

Caption

Providing for individuals to voluntarily register for the Pennsylvania Do-Not-Sell List maintained by the Pennsylvania State Police, for firearms not to be in the possession of a registrant and for advertising by the Department of Health; and imposing penalties.

Impact

If passed, SB40 would establish a formal Do-Not-Sell List that would prevent registered individuals from possessing firearms, thereby impacting existing laws related to gun purchases. The Pennsylvania State Police would be responsible for developing and maintaining this registry, ensuring that personal information is collected securely. Additionally, various state departments would be required to present opportunities for individuals to register for this list, particularly in contexts related to mental health emergencies. This bill aims to create a proactive approach to gun safety in the state, focusing on individuals who voluntarily choose to be listed.

Summary

Senate Bill 40, known as the Do-Not-Sell Firearm Registry Act, proposes a system for individuals to voluntarily register on a list maintained by the Pennsylvania State Police. This system is aimed primarily at individuals who may pose a risk to themselves and others, allowing for their personal information to be placed on a secure registry that prevents them from obtaining firearms. The intent behind this bill is to enhance public safety and provide a mechanism for addressing mental health concerns that can lead to violence.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB40 is mixed, reflecting the broad national debate over gun control and public safety. Supporters of the bill emphasize the importance of addressing the risks associated with firearms in the hands of individuals nearing crisis, asserting that such legislation can save lives. Conversely, critics express concerns about the potential stigmatization of individuals with mental health issues and logistical challenges regarding the implementation and operation of the registry. This creates a complex dialogue around the bill, with valid perspectives on both sides regarding personal freedoms and public safety responsibilities.

Contention

Key points of contention in the discussions surrounding SB40 include concerns about how to maintain the confidentiality of registrants' information while still ensuring the effectiveness of the law. Critics question the balance between protective measures and the rights of individuals to privacy regarding their mental health status. Additionally, there are apprehensions about the potential misuse of the registry and the implications of unfair discrimination against those listed. The effectiveness of the education and outreach efforts to encourage voluntary registration also remains a topic of debate, as it could significantly influence the bill's impact on reducing firearm access among at-risk populations.