Video & Transcript DataContr Research : 'defense against prosecution'
Page 38 of 53
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Is there anyone else that would like to testify for or against the bill?
- If not, is there anyone who would like to speak for or against the bill?
- Is there anyone else who would like to speak for or against?
- Is there anyone else that would like to testify for or against the bill?
- I know the answer, but are you for or against the bill? We have to have that.
Bills:
HCR114, HB137, HB283, HB1398, HB1960, HB2153, HB2431, HB2638, HB2699, HB2999, HB3208, HB3389, HB3413, HB3510, HB3642, HB3859, HB3974, HB3986, HB4142, HB4173, HB4174, HB4542, HB4605, HB4663, HB4731, HB5064, HB5216, HB5218, HB5332, HB5453, HB5577
Keywords:
memorial, pedestrian bridge, Houston, Sergio Ivan Rodriguez, city council, oversize vehicles, transportation permits, Hidalgo County, port authority, highway routes, healthcare, insurance, mental health, treatment access, state funding, transportation, axle weight, aggregates, regulations, Texas law
Summary:
The committee meeting centered on several key pieces of legislation, including discussions around safety at railroad crossings, vehicle operation regulations, and the confidentiality of collected information. House Bill 1772 and Senate Bill 2129 were particularly notable, both aimed at increasing penalties related to vehicle operations at grade crossings. Representative Canales made a significant move for these bills to be forwarded to the House with recommendations for approval, highlighting the collective support from committee members. Public testimony reflected concerns and endorsements regarding transportation safety and legislative impacts on local communities.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- For or against the bill, okay.
- Instead of being either for or against the bill?
- Is there anyone else who would like to speak for or against?
- or against.
- Is there anyone who would like to ask for or against the bill? Oh, Mr. Henney.
Bills:
HB2007, HB2863, HB2921, HB3331, HB3332, HJR144, HB3514, HB3528, HB3720, HB3751, HB3859, HB3947, HB4148, HB4346, HB4880, HB5603, HB4337
Keywords:
commercial signs, county approval, transportation code, regulations, road signage, vehicle title, revocation, hearing process, Transportation Code, county assessor-collector, confidentiality, personal information, local government, airport data, public records, vehicle regulation, transportation, steel industry, state fees, safety standards
Summary:
The committee meeting focused on significant discussions surrounding various legislative bills, particularly those affecting infrastructure and navigation regulations in Texas. Notable among these was HB4148, which aims to modernize outdated regulations impacting navigation districts and port authorities. Vice-Chairman Peruzza presented this bill emphasizing its importance in enhancing operational efficiency and updating management practices to better serve Texas's economic needs. Additionally, the chair laid out HB3332, which addresses regional mobility needs and aims to expedite infrastructure projects, reflecting the growing pressures on local communities due to population influx and outdated facilities. The meeting featured public testimonies that highlighted the urgency for legislative action to support infrastructure developments crucial for economic vitality in the region.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th Regular
Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs May 23rd, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- It wasn't something that I was pushing for, nor was I against.
- And none against it.
- Is there anybody wishing to testify for or against HCR 76?
- Does anybody else wish to testify for or against House Bill 654?
- Anybody else wish to testify for or against Senate Bill 2078?
Keywords:
water management, groundwater, Texas Water Trust, sustainability, House Bill 3333, House Bill 4158, ecological rights
Summary:
The meeting of the committee focused on a variety of bills primarily concerning water management and rights. Significant discussions included House Bill 3333, which addressed the management of groundwater and was moved favorably with a recommendation for local and contested calendars. Additionally, House Bill 4158 was passed unanimously, relating to the oversight of ecological water rights dedicated to the Texas Water Trust. Members of the committee emphasized the importance of these bills for sustainable water management practices in the state, reflecting a shift towards more responsible governance in resource use.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th Regular
Delivery of Government Efficiency Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am
House Delivery of Government Efficiency Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- Or against House Bill 3185.
- Is there anyone else here who wishes to speak for or against?
- Against House Bill 4310.
- Is anyone else here wishing to speak on for or against the bill?
- Is there anyone else who wishes to testify for or against H.B. 5195?
Keywords:
constitutional amendment, fiscal impact, state budget, ballot measure, transparency in voting, management-to-staff ratio, state agencies, employee regulations, government efficiency, workforce management, public information, governing board, transparency, confidentiality, access rights, privacy, identifying information, state agency, consent, occupational license
Summary:
The meeting of the committee was marked by discussions surrounding multiple bills, including HB3719, which concerns the public disclosure of dates of birth, and HB5196, aimed at allowing state agencies to approve telework plans for employees. The chair moved for HB3719 to be reported favorably to the full house, which passed with a vote of 10 in favor and one against. Similarly, HB5196 was favorably reported without objections. A significant focus was placed on increasing digital modernization for state agencies, as illustrated by HB5195, which aims to improve the digital accessibility and functionality of agency websites to enhance small business interactions with the state.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- ...wishing to testify on, for, or against House Bill 4749.
- Is there anyone wishing to testify on, for, or against House
- These are adhesion contracts, and for decades, Texas has said those are against public policy, but now
- I think that was exposed by the Attorneys General and by others who campaigned against it.
- Anyone else care to testify on, for, or against?
Keywords:
property owners' association, free speech, assembly rights, government officials, political candidates, sexual abuse, nondisclosure, confidentiality, public policy, Trey's Law, elections, scannable ballots, voting technology, paper ballots, electoral process, jury service, juror qualifications, grand jury, petit jury, legal implications
Summary:
The meeting held by the committee covered multiple critical bills focusing chiefly on the implications of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) related to child sexual abuse and the prohibition of state investments in companies tied to nations deemed as threats, such as China and Russia. Debate around HB34 emphasized the necessity of protecting Texas taxpayers and maintaining national security by avoiding investments in these adversarial nations. Additionally, House Bill 748 spurred poignant reflections and testimonies from abuse survivors aiming to combat the silencing effect of NDAs on victims. The legislators expressed a consensus on the urgency of these issues, particularly the need for Trey's Law, which aims to empower survivors and diminish the influence of NDAs that shield abusers from accountability.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th Regular
Trade, Workforce & Economic Development Mar 26th, 2025 at 08:00 am
House Trade, Workforce & Economic Development Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- >
Okay, is there anyone here who wishes to testify for or against
- Is there anyone else who wishes to testify for or against
- On for or against HB 3260, the Chair recognizes...
- Is there anyone else who wishes to testify for or against HB1926?
- Anyone else who wishes to testify for or against HB2036?
Keywords:
restrictive covenants, real estate, subdivision regulations, multi-zoned subdivisions, property laws, repair notice, residential, manufactured homes, tenant rights, landlord responsibilities, email communication, property code amendments, real property, public improvement district, contract termination, notice requirement, property sales, development corporation, Gulf Coast Authority, financing projects
Summary:
The meeting addressed several key pieces of legislation, with significant focus on bills related to property owners' associations and the Texas Workforce Commission's training programs. Representative Harris-Navila presented HB517, which aims to allow property owners' associations to impose fines for discolored vegetation during watering restrictions. The committee adopted a community substitute for this bill before moving it forward with a recommendation for passage. Meanwhile, HB2791, highlighted by Chairwoman Button, focusses on vocational rehabilitation programs for individuals with disabilities, with provisions that require efficient operation to avoid lapses in service.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th Regular
S/C on Telecommunications & Broadband May 2nd, 2025 at 08:05 am
House S/C on Telecommunications & Broadband
Transcript Highlights:
- Is there anyone else wishing to testify for or against House Bill 2838?
- the Texas Municipal League and the Texas Coalition of Cities for Utility Issues against the bill.
- I represent 31 Texas cities in litigation against Netflix, Hulu, and Disney. That's it.
- Not against Dish, not against DirecTV. Disney.
- Utility issues against Senate Bill 924. Welcome. Mr.
Keywords:
broadband, internet access, digital equity, tax reduction, government funding, broadband, rural counties, fiber-optic, internet access, state funding, infrastructure, digital divide, economic development, fiber-optic cable, excavation, utilities, civil penalties, municipal regulations, infrastructure, video services
Summary:
The committee meeting focused on two primary bills: HB2838 and SB924. House Bill 2838 aimed to modernize broadband speed standards in line with FCC definitions, aiming to enhance access and reduce tax burdens on Internet services. Chairman Ashby explained the bill's intent to clarify requirements for the Broadband Development Office and included provisions for tax relief to support broadband expansion. Public testimonies presented both neutral and supportive views, emphasizing the importance of aligning state regulations with federal standards, especially for underserved areas. Senators questioned the bill's implications for service equity and federal funding eligibility.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- That's 5-4 against. If not, the Chair recognizes Mr.
And you're against this for the same reasons?
- I'm here against the bill.
- To testify for or against in the audience? If not, the Chair recognizes Mr. Morales to close.
- If there are no witnesses, is there anyone that would like to testify for or against the bill?
Keywords:
county roads, abandonment, public nuisance, safety hazard, transportation, transportation, design-build contracts, Senate Bill 35, public safety, infrastructure, Texas Department of Transportation, Texas Trucking Association
Summary:
The committee meeting focused on various legislative proposals, particularly those related to transportation and public safety. A significant point of discussion was Senate Bill 35, which seeks to limit the Texas Department of Transportation's ability to utilize design-build contracts for infrastructure projects. Advocates for the bill expressed concerns over financial implications and the efficiency of project delivery, while opponents emphasized the need for flexibility and innovation in addressing Texas's growing infrastructure needs. Several stakeholders, including the Texas Trucking Association, engaged in debates over the impacts of the proposed limitations.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Is there anyone else wishing to testify on, for, or against Senate Bill 1636?
- You'll have two minutes, whether you're for or against the bill.
- Is there anyone else wishing to testify for or against Senate Bill 1832? Thank you very much.
- I'm registering against this bill, but we're almost there, Chairman. We're almost there.
- And I said against; I think I want to change.
Keywords:
bonds, education funding, Texas Permanent School Fund, financial transparency, speculative rating, school funding, deferred maintenance, tax revenue, education budget, school districts, school funding, bonds, education, finance, Texas Education Code, misconduct, child abuse, educators, investigation, criminal offense
Summary:
The committee meeting addressed critical issues regarding educator misconduct and legislative measures to improve reporting standards. Significant discussions revolved around SB1224, which mandates that superintendents report allegations of sexual or abusive conduct directly to law enforcement rather than relying solely on internal investigations. This bill, presented by Senator Sparks, reflects an ongoing effort to close loopholes in the education system that enable misconduct to persist without proper accountability. Senators emphasized the alarming rise in educator misconduct cases and the need for more stringent reporting practices to protect children in schools.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Seeing none, is there anyone else who wishes to testify for or against Senate Bill 2206?
- Does anyone wish to testify for or against Senate Joint Resolution 84?
- Is there anyone who wishes to testify for or against Senate Bill 263?
- Is there anyone else who wishes to testify for or against Senate Bill 1030?
- Is there anyone else who wishes to testify for or against Senate Bill 1453?
Keywords:
franchise tax credit, research and development, tax incentives, business growth, higher education, hotel occupancy tax, coastal municipalities, beach maintenance, funding allocation, non-discrimination, tax exemption, property tax, homestead, fire damage, constitutional amendment, Senate Bill 2206, research and development, R&D tax credits, SB2779, hotel occupancy tax
Summary:
The meeting of the committee involved extensive discussions on various important pieces of legislation. Notable among them was SB2206, which aims to extend and improve the state's research and development tax credits, ensuring Texas remains competitive in innovation-driven industries. This bill received strong support from the Texas Association of Manufacturers and other stakeholders, emphasizing the need for continued investment in R&D to bolster economic growth and job creation. Additionally, SB2779 was discussed, which focuses on proper allocation and use of hotel occupancy taxes (HOT) for beach maintenance in coastal communities, specifically addressing concerns about the oversight and management of these funds by local park boards.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
Is there anyone else wishing to testify for or against
- If there's anyone else wishing to testify for or against SCR54, you can make yourself known. Mr.
- I am against a new application.
- Is there anyone else wishing to testify for or against...?
- ...or against an Adjourned Resolution 54.
Keywords:
public school funding, education, budget allocation, financial transparency, state law, local control, fiduciary responsibility, public retirement systems, investment management, proxy voting, financial factors, public retirement systems, fiduciary responsibility, investment management, proxy voting, financial factors, insurance, political shareholder proposals, fossil fuels, greenhouse gas emissions
Summary:
The Committee on State Affairs convened to discuss several significant legislative measures, notably focusing on the SJR54, which is an application for a Convention of States under Article V of the Constitution. The resolution seeks to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit federal jurisdiction, and restrict terms of Congress members. The discussion included historical perspectives and current motivations behind the push for such a convention, highlighting its urgency in light of perceived federal overreach. Members engaged in a thorough debate regarding the implications of a permanent application for a convention, and several witnesses from various interest groups provided testimony both for and against the resolution.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Is there anyone else who wishes to testify for or against Senate Bill 1664? I see none.
- Is there anyone who wishes to testify for or against SCR8? Seeing none, the Chair is recognized.
- Is there anyone who wishes to testify for or against SCR9?
- Seeing none, is there anyone who wishes to testify for or against SCR32?
- Is there anyone else who wishes to testify for or against Senate Bill 1036? The Chair sees none.
Keywords:
utilities, extraterritorial jurisdiction, development plat, water connection, land subdivision, local government, Texas energy fund, grants, loans, utilities, energy capacity, Supreme Court, constitutional amendment, judicial independence, Keep Nine, checks and balances, Texas beef, cattle industry, agricultural heritage, Texas strip steak
Summary:
The meeting of the committee focused on several Senate Concurrent Resolutions and Senate Bills. Notably, SCR8 was introduced to express Texas' strong opposition to the creation of a central bank digital currency, raising concerns about cybersecurity and privacy implications. There was no public testimony for or against, but committee members engaged in dialogue on its potential impact. Another highlight was SCR5, which proposed naming a gymnasium at the Texas School for the Deaf after Robert Rivas, recognizing his significant contributions. This sentiment garnered unanimous support from committee members, highlighting the importance of honoring legacies within the state educational system.
In addition, various bills concerning utilities were discussed, particularly SB1566, which clarifies utility connection requirements, and SB1036, aiming to regulate the solar panel sales industry to protect consumers. The discussions reflected a commitment to enhance transparency in utility rate changes and impose stricter regulations on the solar market to prevent consumer fraud. Overall, the meeting showcased a collaborative approach to addressing pressing legislative matters, with an emphasis on consumer protection and legacy recognition.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Is there anyone who wishes to testify for or against Senate Bill 1854?
- ...and whether you're testifying for or against the bill,
- Is there anyone else who would like to testify for or against Senate Bill 2297?
Against the bill?
- Is there anyone else who wishes to testify for or against Senate Bill 1756?
Bills:
SB1071, SB1444, SB1483, SB1556, SB1703, SB1756, SB1854, SB2036, SB2133, SB2297, SB2622, SB2779, SB2955, SB2979
Keywords:
municipality, tax revenue, hotel project, convention center, economic development, hotel tax, municipal authority, convention center, economic development, local governments, municipality, hotel tax, convention center, tax revenue, local authority, hotel tax, convention centers, municipality, economic development, tax revenue
Summary:
The committee meeting featured a comprehensive discussion surrounding several bills, notably SB1756, SB2297, and SB1483, which are aimed at restructuring hotel occupancy tax revenues and convention center funding in various municipalities. Senators expressed strong opinions about SB1756, with Senator Birdwell highlighting that limiting project financing zone revenues could severely impact cities like Fort Worth and hinder ongoing tourism development efforts. Meanwhile, local leaders from Pflugerville and Anna spoke in favor of bills supporting regional economic growth and infrastructure investment, emphasizing the increasing need for enhanced convention facilities to accommodate rising populations and attract events.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Is there anyone else who wishes to testify for or against
- If there is anyone else who wishes to testify on or against House Concurrent Resolution 12.
- I would encourage y'all to go on YouTube and search for "WFAA against their will."
And Madam Chair, I'm not arguing against your bill;
- ...for or against House Bill 1151.
Keywords:
deaf-blind, co-navigation services, communication accessibility, assistive services, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, advocacy, insurable interest, individuals with disabilities, life insurance, care providers, insurance regulations, child protection, neglect, parent-child relationship, Family Code, Department of Family and Protective Services, healthcare decisions, low-THC cannabis, immunization, nonviolent misdemeanors
Summary:
The committee meeting focused on three significant bills: HB1151, HB1155, and HB1041. A notable discussion arose surrounding HB1151, which aims to protect parental rights regarding medical decisions for children, especially in foster care settings. Supporters highlighted concerns about coercive practices by Child Protective Services that could label parents as neglectful for refusing certain medical treatments. Several witnesses testified in favor of the bill, emphasizing the need for parents to retain autonomy over their children's medical care. There was also a compelling narrative shared regarding a family's struggle with the complexities of health decisions under CPS supervision, further underscoring the importance of this legislation.
The committee also reviewed HB1155, aimed at providing temporary financial assistance to economically disadvantaged families who have completed their service plans for the reunification of children removed by the Department of Family and Protective Services. The sentiment in favor of this bill echoed the challenges faced by families trying to navigate the system while meeting their basic needs. Furthermore, HB1041 was discussed, which seeks to prevent non-family caregivers from being named beneficiaries on life insurance policies of individuals under their care, highlighting a moral obligation to protect vulnerable populations.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Is there anyone else who wishes to testify for or against HB4845?
- Is there anyone else who wishes to testify for or against House Bill 3902?
- Is there anyone else who wishes to testify for or against HB4615?
- Anyone else wishing to testify for or against House Bill 4585?
- Is there anyone else who wishes to testify for or against House Bill 2734?
Bills:
HB660, HB4845, HB3902, HB5396, HB4615, HB1825, HB1403, HB4336, HB4585, HB4371, HB863, SB1589, HB5223, HB3195, HB2734
Keywords:
child protective services, adult protective services, caseload limits, call processing goals, child-care licensing, employee workload, reporting requirements, employee caseload limits, protective services, child-care licensing, call processing goals, workload management, accountability, Department of Family and Protective Services, caseload limits, protective services, child-care licensing, employee goals, call processing, caseload limits
Summary:
The meeting was organized to address several key bills affecting health care and public assistance programs. A significant portion of the time was dedicated to discussing HB4585, which seeks to streamline claims processing for Medicaid providers by instituting strict payment timelines and limiting the use of artificial intelligence in utilization reviews. Representative Spiller and various stakeholders provided testimonies highlighting the frustrations of rural health care providers regarding payment delays. Concerns were raised about preserving patient access to necessary services amid administrative burdens. Another important discussion revolved around HB2734, which aims to combat fraud in public assistance programs, a topic that sparked heated testimonies reflecting the complexities faced by low-income families in navigating application processes. Critics expressed worries that the bill could mistakenly criminalize innocent mistakes in applications.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th Regular
Pensions, Investments & Financial Services May 12th, 2025 at 08:05 am
House Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Committee
Transcript Highlights:
If anyone else wishes to testify for or against Senate
- I'm not in favor or against the bill.
- ...and show you registered to testify against the bill.
- Show you registered to testify against the bill. Is that correct?
- Is there anyone else who wishes to testify for or against Senate Bill 1024?
Keywords:
money transmission, public finance, certificates of obligation, tax anticipation notes, consumer protection, First Amendment, voter will
Summary:
The meeting focused on the discussion of two significant pieces of legislation: SB512 and SB1024. SB512 aims to protect users of money transmission services by preventing penalties imposed by service providers for violating terms of service. Representative Hayes explained that this bill responds to troubling practices observed among money service businesses. Public testimonies were presented both in support and opposition to the bill, highlighting concerns over First Amendment rights and the implications for consumer protection. The committee ultimately left the bill pending for further consideration.
In contrast, SB1024 addresses public finance issues, specifically the misuse of voter-rejected projects through certificates of obligation and tax anticipation notes. Senator Betancourt described instances where municipalities have circumvented voter will by issuing debt for projects previously rejected in elections. The committee heard extensive public testimony critiquing the proposed restrictions in the bill, with arguments centered around the potential unintended consequences for local governments and necessary infrastructure projects. Both bills generated lively discussions among committee members, leading to wider considerations of public finance ethics and the relationship between voters and local governments.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Press Conference: Special Session Jul 31st, 2025 at 10:07 am
Transcript Highlights:
- Very clever, but we're going to stand up against this.
- Unfortunately, we have grown to the point in this country where you can use racism against people.
- higher education for people in this state, you're going to have five people who are going to vote against
- health care, against Medicare, against Social Security, against being able to go to college.
That's what we're here to fight against, and I have
Keywords:
redistricting, gerrymandering, Texas Democrats, voter suppression, Hakeem Jeffries, equitable representation, minority communities, legislative session, political motivations
Summary:
The meeting highlighted significant concerns regarding the proposed redistricting in Texas, primarily driven by perceived political motivations from the Republican leadership. Speaker after speaker emphasized the urgency of stopping what they described as an attempt to gerrymander districts and suppress the votes of marginalized communities. Key figures such as House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries underscored that the current plans threaten not just democratic principles but directly impact the well-being of Texas constituents, particularly minority populations. The meeting stirred passionate debate about ensuring equitable representation and addressing systemic injustices within the electoral process. The persistence of local leaders and their collective stand against these actions was a focal point throughout discussions, showcasing a unified front against manipulation of electoral boundaries.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- For or against House Bill 195.
- Is there anyone else who wishes to testify for or against House Bill 247?
- Is there anyone else who wishes to testify for or against House Bill 255?
- Is there anyone who wishes to testify for or against House Joint Resolution 6?
- Is there anyone else who wishes to testify for or against House Joint Resolution 4?
Keywords:
school district, ad valorem tax, local revenue, tax collection, education funding, border security, tax exemption, ad valorem, real property, infrastructure, Texas-Mexico border, ad valorem taxation, farm products, livestock, timber, tax exemption, death tax, inheritance tax, estate tax, property transfer
Summary:
The meeting of the committee on ways and means centered on several significant bills aimed at addressing property tax issues, particularly regarding agricultural and border security infrastructure. A committee substitute for HB247 was discussed, emphasizing a voluntary approach with private landowners in light of enhanced border security measures, which reassured many stakeholders previously hesitant about such initiatives. Notably, the bill provides tax exemptions for landowners who allow construction of border security infrastructure, effectively alleviating concerns about increased property values leading to higher taxes. Committee members expressed support for transparency and fairness in how these laws impact stakeholders, especially those along the Texas-Mexico border.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- or against House Bill 1109.
- Is there anyone else who wishes to testify for or against House Bill 135?
- Is there anyone else who wishes to testify for or against the House bill?
- And you are testifying against House Bill 134?
- And you are here representing the city and testifying against House Bill 134?
Keywords:
sales tax exemption, exotic animals, game animals, agriculture, livestock, motor fuel tax, county exemption, public school, nonprofit, diesel fuel, tax credit, homestead exemption, property tax, spouse, residential properties, ad valorem tax, homestead exemption, property tax, married couples, principal residence
Summary:
The meeting of the committee was dominated by discussions surrounding House Bill 134, which proposes a shift from origin-based sales tax sourcing to destination-based sourcing in Texas. This bill generated significant debate among committee members and witnesses, with several city representatives expressing strong opposition due to the potential financial impact on their municipalities. Concerns were raised that the bill could lead to the loss of millions in sales tax revenue, which is crucial for funding essential services like public safety, infrastructure, and local development initiatives. As the discussion progressed, the chairman emphasized the need for a comprehensive understanding of the bill's implications on all economic stakeholders, while supporters of the bill argued for its potential to streamline tax regulations.