Video & Transcript DataContr Research : 'public voting'
Page 1 of 61
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- voting.
- of votes received.
- We know people who are supposed to be voting are voting and people who are not supposed to be voting
- are voting.
- voting or not voting.
Keywords:
early voting, ballot correction, voting rights, election integrity, mail-in voting, voter notification, election reporting, candidate percentages, voting results, transparency, electoral reform, election procedures, civil penalty, public officials, election standards, Texas Election Code, voter registration, online application, acknowledgment, elections
Summary:
The House Committee on Elections convened to discuss HB3709, a bill focused on reforming the post-election audit process. Representative Dialo presented the bill, emphasizing its bipartisan support and the critical need for modernization to enhance the integrity and transparency of the voting process. The existing auditing method, which relied on random precinct selection, was criticized for being outdated and inefficient. The proposed changes aim to standardize audits across various voting methods, allowing election officials to evaluate results by voting locations instead of individual precincts, and thus improving accuracy and efficiency.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Countywide voting is done and actually requires a public
- The closest voting location to me is my local public library.
- you vote?
- Well, after I made it public that I was against the machines in the countywide voting, I was...
- Everyone's vote should be private, not just public figures.
Bills:
SB16, SB76, SB310, SB311, SB396, SB505, SB827, SB964, SB1209, SB1210, SB1386, SB1470, SB2035, SJR37
Keywords:
voter registration, proof of citizenship, Election Code, criminal offenses, limited federal ballot, transportation, infrastructure, funding, public safety, state regulation, election, polling places, voter access, state oversight, electronic voting, voting, polling place, elections, countywide program, voter access
Summary:
The meeting focused on significant discussions regarding several bills, particularly SB396 and SB827. Public testimonies were heard against SB396, expressing concerns over government overreach regarding voter registrations. Various witnesses highlighted potential disenfranchisement of eligible voters and the inefficiencies of the proposed residency confirmations. SB827 was another bill of interest, with discussions centered around the methods of election monitoring and concerns regarding the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of hand-counted audits.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- And before Help America Vote, this is how you vote.
- We'll go to public testimony.
- and voting by mail.
- early voting vote centers and mail ballot batches.
- We're going to go to vote.
Keywords:
early voting, electronic application, mail-in ballot, voting accessibility, senior citizens, Texas Election Code, electronic voting, election audits, voting integrity, election code, manual count, risk-limiting audit, voter registration, interstate notification, election code, voter registrar, data sharing, voting, election integrity, tabulation equipment
Summary:
The committee meeting centered on various bills addressing election integrity and transparency. Key discussions included HB5256 which aims to regulate the number of polling places in representative districts, gaining favorable votes after the adoption of a committee substitute. Additionally, HB4288 was presented, focusing on the public inspection of election records, which unfortunately failed to gain support. Noteworthy was SB827, which sought to introduce a more robust auditing process for electronic voting systems, fostering a substantial public testimony segment with both support and opposition evident. The atmosphere was characterized by critical debates on ensuring the democracy and accountability of the electoral processes in the state, reflecting public concerns about election security and accessibility.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Hearing and seeing none, the public testimony is closed, and the bill will be left pending.
- And we're going to open up public testimony on Senate Bill 1470.
- Hearing none, we're going to close public testimony.
- Hearing none, the chair will now open public testimony on Senate Bill 1210.
- The Chair opens up public testimony and calls Alan Place, Jack Rody, and Philip Furlow.
Bills:
SB16, SB76, SB310, SB311, SB396, SB505, SB827, SB964, SB1209, SB1210, SB1386, SB1470, SB2035, SJR37
Keywords:
voter registration, proof of citizenship, Election Code, criminal offenses, limited federal ballot, transportation, infrastructure, funding, public safety, state regulation, election, polling places, voter access, state oversight, electronic voting, voting, polling place, elections, countywide program, voter access
Summary:
The meeting of the Senate Committee on State Affairs was marked by significant discussions surrounding several bills, primarily focusing on jurisdictional changes within the Texas Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals. One of the key bills discussed was SB1210, which aims to clarify the roles and jurisdictions of these two courts, ensuring that when constitutional interpretations are at issue, the Supreme Court serves as the final authority. Testimony was provided by various stakeholders including judges and legal experts, who articulated both support for and concerns about the potential implications of these changes. The conversation highlighted the historical context of the dual court system in Texas, outlining its benefits and drawbacks, particularly in ensuring consistency in the application of constitutional law.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- ballot voted by mail.
- to the polling place to vote.
- This was clearly not curbside voting; it was clearly not intended for mass voting.
- their right to vote.
- And everyone who votes is.
Keywords:
voting access, polling place, disability, caretaker provisions, ballot delivery, election code, ballot by mail, election code, voting, mail delivery, election integrity, filing fee, nomination, convention, election, candidate, voting by mail, assisted living, nursing facilities, legal guardian
Summary:
The House Committee on Elections convened to deliberate on several legislative measures, focusing significantly on the accessibility and integrity of the voting process. Key discussions included the presentation of HB5430, which addresses the declaration of a candidate’s ineligibility based on their filing status. The committee also reviewed Senate Bill SB901, a companion bill that echoes the intentions of HB5430. Other bills such as HB2253 aimed to introduce flexibility for local governments in case of disaster declarations, allowing them to cancel elections in a specified timeframe, emphasizing the need for local leaders to act decisively during crises. Additionally, Senate Bill SB760 was introduced to protect vulnerable populations, ensuring that legal guardians are notified when mail-in ballots are requested by individuals in long-term care facilities. Testimonies both supported and challenged the measures, revealing deep concerns regarding potential implications of these bills on voter rights, particularly for disabled stakeholders and elderly populations.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Public testimony is closed.
- We'll open public testimony.
- voting.
- We'll open public testimony.
- For example, 20,000 votes cast at a given location for early voting.
Keywords:
election procedures, voting systems, ballot counting, voter registration, electronic voting, electioneering, public funds, political advertising, civil penalties, school district, election offenses, prosecution, criminal procedure, district attorney, disqualification, voting by mail, election process, ballot correction, voter notification, electoral integrity
Summary:
The Committee on State Affairs convened for a detailed examination of SB1065. The session was marked by comprehensive discussions surrounding the potential implications of this legislation. Members engaged in dialogue regarding the bill's objectives, with presentations from the bill's author and various stakeholders, highlighting differing perspectives on its necessity and impact. Public input was also sought, allowing for a range of opinions to be expressed, which enriched the deliberative process. Notably, Senator Haldeman emphasized the importance of the bill for improving community resources and addressing urgent needs in public services.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- We will go to public testimony.
- event, including early voting, mail-in voting, and in-person voting.
- period, combining early voting and election day voting with no gaps in between.
- You need to have the whole state go to countywide voting or early voting.
- , all early votes twice.
Keywords:
voter registration, electronic, Texas election law, Signature verification, DPS, internet application, voter registration, electronic, Texas Election Code, signature verification, DPS, online application, data security, voter registration, electronic application, signature verification, Department of Public Safety, information security, electronic voter registration, voting technology
Summary:
The meeting of the House Committee on Elections covered several significant bills, particularly focusing on election integrity and voter registration processes. Notable discussions included the challenges posed by election irregularities and the introduction of electronic voter registration aimed at enhancing efficiency and security. Representative Swanson presented SB 505, which would strengthen oversight in election irregularities, while HB 311, discussed in detail, proposed an electronic voter registration system modeled after successful implementations in other states. Both bills sparked robust discussions among committee members and witnesses, highlighting various perspectives on improving electoral processes. The members indicated a shared goal of maintaining transparency and accountability in Texas elections, though differing opinions on specific measures were apparent throughout the meeting. The meeting adjourned with many bills left pending, awaiting further consideration as the committee seeks a consensus.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- You're talking about the number of votes cast and people who showed up, not how they voted.
- For early voting...
- For example, 20,000 votes cast at a given location for early voting—that discrepancy, I think a higher
- If we had one combined voting period, we'd be generating reports again at the beginning of the voting
- The layout will open public testimony on Senate Bill 2533. Public testimony is now open.
Keywords:
election procedures, voting systems, ballot counting, voter registration, electronic voting, electioneering, public funds, political advertising, civil penalties, school district, election offenses, prosecution, criminal procedure, district attorney, disqualification, voting by mail, election process, ballot correction, voter notification, electoral integrity
Summary:
The committee meeting covered numerous bills focusing on election integrity and transparency, alongside various regulatory measures. Senator Middleton presented SB1717, aimed at transferring the regulation of charitable bingo, and it was reported favorably to the Senate. Key discussions also revolved around SB1845 concerning registration for lobbyists engaged in activities on behalf of foreign adversaries, which received unanimous support. Another significant bill was SB2216, which addresses the security of election system equipment; it also passed with no opposition. The session was marked by contributions from various senators, emphasizing accountability and the integrity of the electoral process.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- We are having to restrict the information the public can get for public use.
- An early voter, someone who voted during the early voting period, told us they had voted, and we found
- If you're going to have countywide voting, you have to have electronic voting poll books.
- Public testimony is now closed.
- , early voting by mail.
Keywords:
voter registration, interstate notification, election code, voter registrar, data sharing, election security, voting system, equipment maintenance, storage, election integrity, ballot propositions, election procedures, city charters, transparency, public voting, ectopic pregnancy, continuing education, medical emergencies, healthcare, physician training
Summary:
The meeting involved several key discussions surrounding new legislation, notably SB801, which addresses barriers faced by unhoused young adults in obtaining necessary documentation like birth certificates. Witnesses, including Maria Benavides from SA Youth, testified on how these hurdles impact access to jobs and housing, emphasizing the importance of removing financial barriers to obtaining identification. Additionally, the committee examined SB1200, aimed at increasing transparency in lawsuits against defense contractors connected to foreign adversaries, highlighting national security concerns. Senator Cole Corse articulated the bill's aim to disclose relationships between plaintiffs and adversarial nations, promoting accountability in litigation funding.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- I will vote for it. I'll vote for it here.
- voting, okay?
- of Public Safety.
- Last thing for voting in person, if they're voting the federal limited ballot, they have to vote in person
- There's no mail voting.
Keywords:
ballot application, voting by mail, Election Code, size requirements, font size, elections, public records, administration, confidentiality, force majeure, polling places, elections, voting access, local governance, state representative districts, voter registration, third-party challenge, election integrity, sworn statement, registration qualifications
Summary:
The meeting focused primarily on HB5337, which aimed to implement stricter voter identification requirements in Texas. During the session, various stakeholders, including members of the public, expressed their concerns regarding the potential disenfranchisement of eligible voters, particularly among older citizens and tribal populations. Critics of the bill highlighted that many Texan citizens might not possess the necessary documentation to comply with the new requirements, resulting in unintended consequences at the polls. Notably, representatives raised questions about the practicality of enforcing these regulations without negatively impacting voter turnout, especially for vulnerable demographics.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- or precinct voting, because the votes will be reported by polling location.
- vote.
- With early voting, anybody can vote at any location.
- On voting day, you should have all the votes you need by then to count.
- ballot voted by mail.
Keywords:
election officials, confidentiality, personal information, government transparency, public safety, spirit beverages, alcoholic beverages, Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code, distribution, taxation, firearms, local regulation, archery equipment, weapons, public safety, voter registration, statewide list, county requirements, election integrity, computer services contracts
Summary:
The meeting of the State Affairs Committee involved deliberations on a series of significant bills addressing issues such as election procedures, mental health crises, and the interplay between homelessness and public safety. Notably, Senator Parker presented Senate Bill 2487, focusing on creating infrastructure for mental health crisis management in urban areas, emphasizing the need for crisis service centers. Testimonies were heard from various stakeholders about the impact of mental health on homelessness, with supporters advocating for more comprehensive care while opposing viewpoints cautioned against conflating mental illness with criminal behavior. Another prominent discussion was around Senate Bill 2876, which proposed increasing penalties for rioting, specifically targeting those who conceal their identities. This stirred public outcry as civil rights advocates raised concerns about potential profiling and freedom of expression.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th Regular
State Affairs (Part II)Audio only. Apr 7th, 2025
Senate State Affairs Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- We can reconsider the vote; it's easy.
- We can show you as a no vote.
- He wants to vote no.
- Let's vote one more time on Senate Bill 1184.
- He can vote present, not voting, or he can turn around.
Keywords:
voter registration, interstate notification, election code, voter registrar, data sharing, election security, voting system, equipment maintenance, storage, election integrity, ballot propositions, election procedures, city charters, transparency, public voting, ectopic pregnancy, continuing education, medical emergencies, healthcare, physician training
Summary:
The meeting of the Senate Committee on State Affairs featured several important bills, particularly focusing on alcohol regulations and controlled substances. Notably, Senator Perry presented Senate Bill 1868, which aims to update the Controlled Substance Act by allowing kratom in its natural state to be legal, recognizing its natural benefits while continuing to ban certain synthetic derivatives. The bill was positively received and reported favorably to the Senate without any objections. Further discussions included provisions related to the sale of alcoholic beverages and a joint resolution concerning veto overrides from the last legislative session.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- We will open public testimony on Senate Bill 3031.
- Seeing and hearing none, public testimony is closed.
- With that, we're going to open up public testimony.
- I'm going to turn the gavel back over to you for the public testimony.
- Seeing and hearing none, public testimony is closed. Bills left pending at this time.
Keywords:
election officials, confidentiality, personal information, government transparency, public safety, spirit beverages, alcoholic beverages, Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code, distribution, taxation, firearms, local regulation, archery equipment, weapons, public safety, voter registration, statewide list, county requirements, election integrity, computer services contracts
Summary:
The Senate Committee on State Affairs convened to discuss three critical bills, primarily centered around national security concerns and their implications on civil liberties. Notably, Senate Bill 2514 drew significant scrutiny and opposition from various witnesses who raised alarms about how the bill could infringe upon free speech rights and privacy. The bill aims to establish a framework for identifying and monitoring foreign influence operations against Texas, specifically targeting adversaries like China and Russia. Proponents argued that such measures are necessary to protect the integrity of state governance and prevent malign foreign influence, while opponents warned that it may lead to excessive governmental oversight and potential abuse of power.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- This is, as voted out of this committee.
- for more than 91% of the voting shares.
- They target these public pensions. Why?
- proxy votes have gotten better.
- BlackRock voted in 2020 before BlackRock voted on a shareholder proposal urging Jack-in-the-Box to determine
Keywords:
public school funding, education, budget allocation, financial transparency, state law, local control, fiduciary responsibility, public retirement systems, investment management, proxy voting, financial factors, public retirement systems, fiduciary responsibility, investment management, proxy voting, financial factors, insurance, political shareholder proposals, fossil fuels, greenhouse gas emissions
Summary:
The meeting conducted by the committee featured an extensive discussion on multiple bills, particularly focusing on the ethics reform via SB2403, aimed at enhancing the structure and enforcement processes of the Texas Ethics Commission. The conversation revolved around establishing a three-tier system categorizing violations and enhancing procedural fairness and accountability in ethics investigations. Senator Mayes introduced a committee substitute, emphasizing the importance of ensuring that enforcement processes are transparent and just, particularly relating to minor infractions. Public testimonies in favor of the bill highlighted the need for reform, while concerns were raised about maintaining integrity in oversight mechanisms.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- I'm with the Public Policy Foundation.
- Each vote was 15 to 16 or 16 to 15.
- on the individual planks, 51% of those in attendance voted against the COS plank.
- When that vote was adjusted to a voting strength percentage, the plank barely passed and had the lowest
- Seeing and hearing none, public testimony is closed.
Keywords:
public school funding, education, budget allocation, financial transparency, state law, local control, fiduciary responsibility, public retirement systems, investment management, proxy voting, financial factors, public retirement systems, fiduciary responsibility, investment management, proxy voting, financial factors, insurance, political shareholder proposals, fossil fuels, greenhouse gas emissions
Summary:
The Committee on State Affairs convened to discuss several significant legislative measures, notably focusing on the SJR54, which is an application for a Convention of States under Article V of the Constitution. The resolution seeks to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit federal jurisdiction, and restrict terms of Congress members. The discussion included historical perspectives and current motivations behind the push for such a convention, highlighting its urgency in light of perceived federal overreach. Members engaged in a thorough debate regarding the implications of a permanent application for a convention, and several witnesses from various interest groups provided testimony both for and against the resolution.
TX
Keywords:
public school funding, education, budget allocation, financial transparency, state law, local control, fiduciary responsibility, public retirement systems, investment management, proxy voting, financial factors, public retirement systems, fiduciary responsibility, investment management, proxy voting, financial factors, insurance, political shareholder proposals, fossil fuels, greenhouse gas emissions
Summary:
The Committee on State Affairs convened to address significant issues surrounding the state's public pension investments and the involvement of major financial services firms. Notably, Senator Bettencourt proposed a motion to issue subpoenas to compel testimony from BlackRock and State Street Corporation regarding their investment practices that impact Texas's public pension funds. This motion sparked discussions about accountability and transparency in investment practices, leading to a unanimous vote in favor of the motion. The committee emphasized the importance of testimony from these companies, recognizing that the subpoena power is a rare but necessary tool in legislative oversight.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
Right to close and go to public testimony.
- Now, I voted for Representative John Bucy III.
- They go vote and register, you know, it's public information that they voted in the Republican or Democratic
- I know that someone can't vote for and nominate multiple candidates in different districts.
- nominees or whether they could only vote for nominees in their own district.
Keywords:
voting access, polling place, disability, caretaker provisions, ballot delivery, election code, ballot by mail, election code, voting, mail delivery, election integrity, filing fee, nomination, convention, election, candidate, voting by mail, assisted living, nursing facilities, legal guardian
Summary:
The meeting of the committee focused primarily on discussions surrounding HB4309, aimed at allowing third parties to handle filing fees similarly to major political parties. Witnesses from the Libertarian Party, including Wes Benedict, expressed the need for equitable treatment in political financing, highlighting how fees imposed on them currently do not assist their party in any meaningful way like they do for Republicans and Democrats. Concerns were raised regarding the lack of accountability for fees collected from third parties, with committee members discussing potential oversight mechanisms.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Congressional Redistricting, Select Jul 26th, 2025 at 11:07 am
Transcript Highlights:
- going to have the opportunity for public hearings on the maps that are redrawn prior to us voting on
- votes.
- during a special session or votes in order to allow sufficient time for the public to review the maps
- And allow for these folks to vote how they vote.
- It reinforces vote dilution, denies the pending plaintiffs a remedy, and erodes public trust.
Keywords:
redistricting, representation, public testimony, Congressional Districts, gerrymandering, Voting Rights Act, community engagement
Summary:
The House Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting convened to discuss a revised congressional redistricting plan as part of a special session. The meeting focused on public testimony regarding potential revisions to the redistricting map due to concerns about representation for Congressional Districts 2, 7, 8, and 9. Several witnesses testified against the proposed changes, expressing worries about gerrymandering and the disproportionate impact on minority communities. Notably, Deborah Allen, a former city council member, implored the committee members to heed the concerns of constituents who fear losing representation during this critical redistricting process. The atmosphere was charged as multiple lawmakers and public members voiced their frustrations about the perceived political motives driving the redistricting efforts rather than addressing urgent local needs.
The committee faced questions regarding the lack of concrete maps available for public commentary, raising concerns about transparency in the redistricting process. Some members argued that the hearings should prioritize community engagement across the state rather than being limited to a few locations. Various testimonies highlighted fears that the redistricting plan might undermine the gains made in voter representation, particularly among marginalized groups. As the meeting concluded, it became clear that the committee might need to hold further hearings to ensure the public's voice was adequately represented before moving forward with any decisions.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Congressional Redistricting, Select Jul 28th, 2025 at 05:07 pm
Transcript Highlights:
- , at the time of voting, our voting age population was 8.9% black and brown, and with...
- every vote counts.
- Why can't I vote where I've always voted?
- and to vote.
- My vote counts.
Keywords:
redistricting, gerrymandering, public testimony, congressional maps, representation, minority communities, discrimination, voting rights
Summary:
The committee meeting primarily focused on public testimonies regarding the revised congressional redistricting plan. Numerous witnesses presented their concerns about how the proposed changes could potentially dilute representation for minority communities. A consistent theme throughout the testimonies was the fear that the redistricting effort was not aimed at serving constituents but rather at securing power for political parties. Several participants expressed a strong opposition to what they perceived as gerrymandering tactics, claiming they would negatively impact African-American and Hispanic communities in Texas. The meeting revealed a clear public sentiment against the redistricting proposals, with nearly all witnesses speaking out against the changes. The Chair noted an overwhelming number of testimonies opposing the redistricting, indicating a strong community response to the proposed changes and their implications on fair representation.