Video & Transcript DataContr Research : 'taxpayer funds'
Page 1 of 50
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- We were able to fund it at $20 million, and I'm proud to say that that money went pretty quick because
- So this investment not only supports our seniors but also saves Texas taxpayers millions of dollars annually
- relating to public education, including the rights and compensation of public school educators and funding
Keywords:
bail denial, illegal aliens, felony offenses, constitutional amendment, law enforcement, bail reform, defendants, pretrial detention, public safety, criminal justice, charitable bail organizations, bail bonds, public funds, political subdivision, injunctive relief, taxpayer rights, bail denial, illegal aliens, felony offenses, constitutional amendment
Summary:
During the latest committee meeting, a range of resolutions and bills were introduced and discussed, including significant recognitions for various organizations and communities. Notably, several resolutions were adopted to honor Alabama Coushatta Tribe of Texas Day and to recognize key contributions from the manufacturing sector in Texas. Senators shared personal anecdotes and expressed gratitude towards the tireless efforts of Texas game wardens who play a critical role in community safety and environmental conservation.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th Regular
Criminal Justice (Part II) Feb 12th, 2025
Senate Criminal Justice Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- span> ...costs of detention from the federal government to Texas taxpayers
- ...ultimately forces Texas taxpayers to cover the costs that
- p>
The toll on them personally also burdens communities and taxpayers
Keywords:
bail reform, defendants, pretrial detention, public safety, criminal justice, charitable bail organizations, bail reform, criminal procedure, public safety report, victim notification, family violence, bail bonds, public funds, political subdivision, injunction, taxpayer rights, bail reform, violent crimes, sexual offenses, community safety
Summary:
The Senate Committee for Criminal Justice convened to discuss several significant pieces of legislation, including SB999, SB1047, SB40, SJR1, and SJR5. Notably, SJR5 sparked a robust debate among committee members and witnesses regarding its potential implications on pre-trial detention practices. Witnesses expressed concerns about the risks of pre-emptive detention outlined in the bill and the associated human costs, particularly for those who are innocent. Testimonies highlighted the disparity in how such legislation could disproportionately affect marginalized communities and lead to increased incarceration rates without addressing the root causes of crime. Overall, the committee displayed a commitment to ensuring public safety while wrestling with the balance of due process rights for individuals.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- In just the past 12 years, research funding has increased
- They claimed that no taxpayer dollars were used or transferred to them in association with bail.
Senate Bill 40 speaks to public funds.
- Public funds, it depends on which account it's in. Is it accruing interest?
- It was clear that it was not coming from public funds.
Bills:
SJR1, SB9, SB40, SJR36, SJR1, SJR5, SB9, SB40, SJR1, SB9, SB40, SR62, SR92, SR95, SR108, SR110, SR111, SR113, SR114, SR117, SR120, SB314, SB314
Keywords:
bail denial, illegal aliens, felony offenses, constitutional amendment, law enforcement, bail reform, defendants, pretrial detention, public safety, criminal justice, charitable bail organizations, bail bonds, public funds, political subdivision, injunctive relief, taxpayer rights, bail denial, illegal aliens, felony offenses, constitutional amendment
Summary:
The meeting of the Senate addressed significant legislative changes regarding bail procedures and the use of public funds in bail payments. Notably, the committee reviewed SB9 and SB40, both aimed at tightening regulations surrounding bail bonds and enhancing public safety. Senator Huffman presented an amendment to SB9 that allows judges to reassess bail after indictments, especially in cases of violent offenders, reiterating the need for strict bail practices to protect victims and communities. Additionally, SB40 introduces restrictions on the use of public funds by local governments to cover bail for defendants, addressing public concerns over the transparency and safety implications of such practices.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th Regular
Criminal Justice (Part I) Feb 12th, 2025
Senate Criminal Justice Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- SB40 prevents taxpayer dollars from funding bailouts for criminals.
- The idea that public funds are being used to release...
- I urge you to pass SB40 to restore public faith in the justice system and taxpayer-funded projects.
- , unlike the DPS labs that are funded by the state.
- As she referred to it, it's a funding issue, right?
Keywords:
bail reform, defendants, pretrial detention, public safety, criminal justice, charitable bail organizations, bail reform, criminal procedure, public safety report, victim notification, family violence, bail bonds, public funds, political subdivision, injunction, taxpayer rights, bail reform, violent crimes, sexual offenses, community safety
Summary:
The committee meeting centered around discussions of Senate Bill 9, focusing on bail reform and the recent trends affecting public safety in Texas. Multiple witnesses provided testimony, both in support of and against the bill, highlighting the implications of current bail practices. Supporters argued that the bill would enhance public safety and reduce the release of violent offenders, while opponents raised concerns about due process and the potential negative impact on low-income individuals unable to pay bail. The chair acknowledged the heartfelt testimonies from victims' families, emphasizing the emotional weight of the legislative changes being considered. The meeting was marked by a passionate discourse about balancing public safety with individual rights in the judicial system.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- marker="2509" data-time="23125">So what Senate Bill 12 does is it bans the unethical practice of taxpayer-funded
- dollars funding things that were absolutely against the will of the taxpayer.
- representation of the overall lobbyist activity, and that's because it excludes two other types of taxpayer-funded
- And so it is an incredible waste of taxpayer money to be funding lobbyists to do the job that elected
- In 2017, as you all know, local governments spent over $40 million on taxpayer-funded lobbying.
Keywords:
hemp, cannabinoids, licensing, consumable products, criminal offenses, registration, age restrictions, administrative penalties, election laws, attorney general, prosecution, criminal offenses, local prosecutor, election laws, attorney general, criminal prosecution, law enforcement, jurisdiction, lobbying, public funds
Summary:
The committee meeting focused on discussions surrounding public safety and health, particularly in relation to the regulation of THC products through Senate Bills 5, 11, and 12. A significant point of contention was Senate Bill 5, which sought to regulate THC products to prioritize child safety, with law enforcement officials arguing that existing regulations have failed to protect youth adequately. The committee heard several testimonies from both supporters and opponents of the legislation, emphasizing a deep divide on the efficacy of regulation versus prohibition. Lawmakers debated the implications of these bills, with some members advocating for a complete ban while others called for more moderate, regulated approaches to address the concerns surrounding THC consumption and its impact on mental health. Notably, the meeting concluded with a series of votes indicating a strong push towards tightening regulations on THC products to ensure public safety.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- It stated, "It is a false claim that taxpayer-funded lobbying works against the interests of taxpayers
- The subject is taxpayer-funded lobbying. It is such a creative bill. It's such a title.
- I told her what I was going to be doing today, and I mentioned taxpayer-funded lobbyists.
- That's what taxpayer-funded lobbying does. And that's done with our own tax dollars, by the way.
- Taxpayer-funded lobbyists have lobbied against election integrity.
Keywords:
hemp regulation, consumable products, cannabinoids, occupational licenses, criminal offenses, lobbying, public funds, political subdivisions, government accountability, transparency, taxpayer-funded lobbying, election integrity, SB11, SB12, hemp-derived THC, community advocacy, transparency, local control
Summary:
The committee meeting held a vigorous debate primarily concerning Senate Bills 11, 12, and 5, each addressing significant legislative issues including taxpayer-funded lobbying, election integrity, and the regulation of hemp-derived THC products. Proponents of SB12 defended it as necessary for transparency and fiscal responsibility, emphasizing the suppression of taxpayer-funded lobbying as a means to protect taxpayer interests. In contrast, opponents raised concerns that the bill would silence local government voices and hinder advocacy from smaller communities, arguing that it undermines local control and representation in the legislative process. Throughout the discussions, key testimonies illustrated the political divides over these legislative priorities, generating significant public interest and engagement.
TX
Keywords:
hemp, consumable products, cannabinoids, licensing, regulations, election law, attorney general, prosecution, voter integrity, law enforcement, lobbying, public funds, political subdivisions, government transparency, taxpayer protection, Senate, Senator Zaffirini, flood safety, disaster preparedness, youth camp
Summary:
The meeting convened with the primary focus on several Senate Bills introduced by Senator Zaffirini, addressing important issues like flood safety and disaster preparedness. The committee discussed SB41, which mandates evacuation notices for youth camps during floods, and SB43, which pertains to permit exemptions for certain dams. Another critical item was SB49, concerning emergency operations plans and safety drills within youth camps. The senator emphasized the significance of these bills in enhancing safety measures for vulnerable populations, and several members voiced their support for the proactive approach in tackling flood-related challenges. Public testimony was minimal, but the committee expressed a strong intent to ensure these bills are thoroughly reviewed in upcoming sessions.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Press Conference: Senator Nathan JohnsonRegarding legislative proposals to regulate hemp-derived THC products and to decriminalize adult-use cannabis. Joined by Senator Molly Cook, and others. Jul 30th, 2025
Texas Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Program, which has been expanded and improved greatly in the past session, still receives insufficient funding
- An option that honors individual choice, makes better use of enforcement resources and taxpayer dollars
- to damage individuals, families, and communities while unnecessarily imposing tremendous costs on taxpayers
- We also want more funding for testing so that the revenue generated through the sales of legal hemp-derived
Keywords:
hemp, consumable products, cannabinoids, licensing, regulations, election law, attorney general, prosecution, voter integrity, law enforcement, lobbying, public funds, political subdivisions, government transparency, taxpayer protection, THC regulation, public health, hemp-derived THC, decriminalization, public testimony
Summary:
The meeting focused on the pressing issue of THC regulation in Texas, led by several key legislators including Senator Johnson who emphasized the need for a comprehensive regulatory framework for THC products. Key topics included the unregulated sale of hemp-derived THC, its negative impact on public health, especially among children, and the disproportionate incarceration rates for minor marijuana offenses. Senators discussed the need for reforms to create a safer, more enforceable regulatory environment as public sentiment increasingly favors regulation over prohibition. Numerous public testimonies highlighted personal experiences and the necessity of changing current laws to reflect public safety and health concerns.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- vulnerable to being used by someone other than the intended recipient, which would constitute misuse of taxpayer
- and ensures that taxpayer dollars are used for their intended
- However, we are against throwing away $8.7 million in taxpayer funds per year, and that is what SB 1183
- It is a simple waste of taxpayer money.
- Members, School Health and Related Services, better known as SHARS, is a federally funded...
Keywords:
fraud prevention, Medicaid eligibility, verification, healthcare benefits, data matching, family preservation, foster care, child welfare, community-based care, parent-child relationship, Department of Family and Protective Services, case management, service provider selection, Senate Bill 1183, Lone Star card, snap fraud, caretakers, taxpayer funds, Senate Bill 1952, Public testimony
Summary:
In this meeting of the Committee on Human Services, key discussions centered on Senate Bills 1183 and 1952. The committee examined SB 1183, which proposes requiring the Lone Star card used for financial assistance programs to feature the recipient's name and photo. This bill faced significant opposition with members arguing that implementing the changes would lead to wasteful spending of taxpayer funds without effectively reducing fraud. Representatives highlighted that the majority of fraud involves retailers rather than recipients, raising questions about the bill's actual impact. The discussions also emphasized the potential challenges faced by caretakers and families in accessing benefits during emergencies due to new identification requirements imposed by the bill.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th Regular
89th Legislative Session May 19th, 2025 at 10:05 am
Texas House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- It just says that a municipality can't use taxpayer funds
- It just says that taxpayer funds cannot be used to provide bail for.
- funds to support those non-profit entities.
- It just says that taxpayer funds cannot be used to provide bail for bailouts of people. Okay.
The dispute was over whether any taxpayer funds are
Bills:
SB664, SB40, SB9, SJR1, SJR5, SB27, SB207, SB2938, SB1901, SB1227, SB1248, SB912, SB1321, SB2143, SB2145, SB1497, SB1239, SB2180, SB1388, SB1762, SB1662, SB1951, SB1537, SB493, SB378, SB1020, SB1018, SB992, SB958, SB920, SB1350, SCR25, SB687, SB1332, SB2185, SB552, SB664, SB40, SB9, SJR1, SJR5, SB458, SB482, SB927, SB984, SB651, SB1620, SB2124, SB2448, SB841, SB843, SB402, SB2662, SB2053, SB2332, SB2112, SB745, SB1247, SB1789, SB27, SB207, SB2938, SB1901, SB1227, SB1248, SB912, SB1321, SB2143, SB2145, SB1497, SB1239, SB2180, SB1388, SB1762, SB1662, SB1951, SB1537, SB493, SB378, SB1020, SB1018, SB992, SB958, SB920, SB1350, HCR76, HCR127, HCR9, HCR40, HCR118, HR559, HCR59, HCR135, HCR141, HCR46, HCR109, HCR10, SCR25, HB2525, HB142, HB140, HB29, HB451, HB3809, HB3307, HB1130, HJR1, HB9, SB17, SB260, SB509, SB1506, SB1637, SB2308
Keywords:
bail bonds, public funds, political subdivision, injunctive relief, taxpayer rights, bail reform, defendants, pretrial detention, public safety, criminal justice, charitable bail organizations, bail denial, illegal aliens, felony offenses, constitutional amendment, law enforcement, bail, felony offenses, criminal justice reform, public safety
Summary:
The committee's meeting was marked by several key discussions surrounding numerous bills and resolutions. Notably, HCR 9 and HCR 40 were adopted, with representatives urging Congress for reimbursement related to border security under Operation Lone Star. Additionally, HCR 118 showed expressions of support for the warship manufacturing industry, reflecting a strong emphasis on local economic development. Senate Bills 1321, 2143, and 2145 passed various readings, which included provisions regarding law enforcement authority and the adaptability of public improvement districts to conduct meetings virtually. The meeting was well attended and featured numerous votes on significant legislative items, showcasing active participation from both members and the public.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Senate Session (Part I)Opening Day of the 89th Legislature, First Called Session Jul 21st, 2025
Texas Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
Legislation to provide relief funding for response to
- Which began in early July 2025, including local match funding
Legislation prohibiting taxpayer-funded lobbying, including
Keywords:
redistricting, Senate procedures, public input, Texas Legislature, amendments, redistricting, Texas Senate, congressional districts, public input, legislative procedures, redistricting, Senate procedures, congressional districts, public input, legislative transparency, redistricting, Senate rules, congressional districts, public hearings, committee procedures
Summary:
The meeting of the 89th Legislature featured discussions primarily centered around several key bills, including SB648 concerning protections against title theft and deed fraud, SB1253 which addresses impact fees for builders incorporating water conservation measures, and SB2878 related to the administration of the judicial department. The session began with a prayer acknowledging the devastating floods that affected Central Texas, followed by a message from Governor Greg Abbott calling for the special session. Members engaged in robust debates on the importance of the proposed legislations, particularly focusing on community recovery efforts following recent natural disasters. Public testimonies were elicited, highlighting the varied perspectives on the bills under discussion and underscoring the significance of legislative action in response to constituents' needs.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Us being here costs the state of Texas taxpayers money, right?
- /span> I look forward to the makeup of the state of Texas and funding
Keywords:
redistricting, Senate procedures, public input, Texas Legislature, amendments, redistricting, Texas Senate, congressional districts, public input, legislative procedures, redistricting, Senate procedures, congressional districts, public input, legislative transparency, redistricting, Senate rules, congressional districts, public hearings, committee procedures
Summary:
The meeting focused primarily on the congressional redistricting resolution prompted by the governor's request due to constitutional concerns flagged by the U.S. Department of Justice. Members discussed the procedural steps necessary to establish a special committee on congressional redistricting, emphasizing the need for transparency and public participation. Concerns were raised about the limited number of planned regional hearings and the implications for community input. A strong commitment to include public testimony through both in-person and virtual means was stated, ensuring that Texans can engage with the process regardless of their geographical location.
Discussions included the necessity of adopting prior successful procedures similar to those in past sessions, with an acknowledgment of the unique challenges posed by current legal requirements. Members expressed varying viewpoints on balancing the need for thorough public participation while addressing logistical challenges inherent in the redistricting process. Overall, the meeting demonstrated a collaborative atmosphere aimed at crafting a fair and lawful redistricting plan while acknowledging the diverse opinions of constituents throughout Texas.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Us being here costs the state of Texas taxpayers money.
- "896" data-time="5366">It is important and very important to the makeup of the state of Texas and funding
- on the $3.3 billion award and is requiring the state to put it through a new NOFA, a new notice of funds
- The Texas voters approved $1.5 billion from our state budget to create a broadband infrastructure fund
- data-time="12296">Senate Bill 12 by Middleton, relating to the use by political subdivisions of public funds
Keywords:
redistricting, Senate procedures, public input, Texas Legislature, amendments, redistricting, Texas Senate, congressional districts, public input, legislative procedures, redistricting, Senate procedures, congressional districts, public input, legislative transparency, redistricting, Senate rules, congressional districts, public hearings, committee procedures
Summary:
The meeting centered around the discussion of congressional redistricting, where the committee established the procedures to ensure a fair and transparent process. Led by Senator King, the session focused on adopting a resolution that authorized a special committee dedicated to congressional redistricting and allowed for regional hearings to gather public input via videoconferencing. Concerns were raised about ensuring adequate notice for public participation, especially from marginalized communities potentially affected by proposed changes. Disagreements emerged regarding the timeline for regional hearings and how to address the implications of the redistricting process on minority districts. Overall, participants acknowledged the complex nature of redistricting and the importance of engaging constituents in the legislative process.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th Regular
89th Legislative Session May 20th, 2025 at 10:05 am
Texas House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- funding needed for this.
- I don't think it's just a handful of taxpayers. Do you?
- expanding, the people, the healthcare providers, mental health professionals who can qualify for taxpayer-funded
- But still, I wouldn't want to use my taxpayers' money to fund...
- Members, taxpayers have...
Bills:
SB4, SB23, SB3, SJR2, SJR85, SB34, SB60, SB75, SB706, SB1814, SB1220, SB523, SB565, SB1253, SB840, SB764, SB2383, SB2155, SB1535, SB1405, SB1423, SB1566, SB1804, SB1728, SB1816, SB1952, SB1948, SB2037, SB2068, SB1455, SB213, SB243, SB627, SB646, SB670, SB896, SB917, SB1184, SB971, SB1255, SB1261, SB1283, SB1358, SB991, SB1733, SB21, SB231, SB739, SB1252, SB1371, SB664, SB40, SB9, SJR1, SB687, SB1332, SB458, SB482, SB927, SB984, SB651, SB1620, SB2124, SB2448, SB841, SB843, SB402, SB2662, SB2053, SB2332, SB2112, SB745, SB1247, SB1789, SB27, SB207, SB2938, SB1901, SB1227, SB1248, SB912, SB1321, SB2143, SB2145, SB1497, SB1239, SB2180, SB1388, SB1662, SB1951, SB1537, SB493, SB378, SB1020, SB1018, SB992, SB958, SB920, SB1350, SB1762, SB552, HCR109, SB2185, SB4, SB23, SB3, SJR2, SJR85, SB34, SB60, SB75, SB706, SB1814, SB1220, SB523, SB565, SB1253, SB840, SB764, SB2383, SB2155, SB1535, SB1405, SB1423, SB1566, SB1804, SB1728, SB1816, SB1952, SB1948, SB2037, SB2068, SB1455, SB213, SB243, SB627, SB646, SB670, SB896, SB917, SB1184, SB971, SB1255, SB1261, SB1283, SB1358, SB991, SB1733, SB21, SB231, SB739, SB1252, SB1371, HB2970, HB109, SB2308
Keywords:
property tax, homestead exemption, school funding, state aid, constitutional amendment, homestead exemption, elderly, disabled, ad valorem taxation, school district funding, veterinary, regulation, licensing, complaints, standards, administrative penalties, broadband access, tax reduction, internet service, rural connectivity
Summary:
The committee meeting was marked by dynamic discussions surrounding various legislative bills, notably SB1283 aimed at enhancing security in senior retirement communities following tragic incidents in the past. The bill, presented by Ms. Garcia-Hernandez, outlined essential measures including mandatory background checks for staff and a clear communication policy on criminal activities. The meeting also saw vigorous debates on multiple financial resolutions related to the statewide budget surplus, emphasizing the need for strategic allocation to property tax relief, as voiced by several committee members. Tensions arose as representatives questioned local government spending, reflecting a broader concern over escalating taxes across the state.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th Regular
Delivery of Government Efficiency Mar 5th, 2025 at 10:30 am
House Delivery of Government Efficiency Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- I'm assuming that that's any taxpayer-funded entity.
- in a taxpayer-funded entity in the state...
- But my goal, my aim, is for us to be able to do contracts like that so that every taxpayer-funded entity
- ; these are taxpayer funds that are being invested by TASB.
- Because theoretically you only need this funding really temporarily, as you're paying outgoing taxpayer
Keywords:
government efficiency, accountability, public hearings, cybersecurity, state agencies, taxpayer dollars, oversight, modernization, legislative proposals
Summary:
The meeting of the House Committee on Delivery of Government Efficiency marked the beginning of a new era focused on holding government agencies accountable and eliminating inefficiencies. Chairman Capriglione emphasized the committee's role in modernizing state government, implementing rigorous oversight, and ensuring that taxpayer dollars are used effectively. The committee plans to address waste, mismanagement, and corruption, aiming for an ambitious agenda over the next 22 months. Discussions included the establishment of public hearings to foster transparency and the development of legislative proposals to drive reform. Several state agencies provided insights into their operations, with a particular focus on how they can better serve the public through increased efficiency and enhanced cybersecurity measures.
US
Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session
Business meeting to consider the nomination of Michael Faulkender, of Maryland, to be Deputy Secretary of the Treasury; to be immediately followed by hearings to examine the nomination of Mehmet Oz, of Pennsylvania, to be Administrator of the Centers Mar 14th, 2025 at 09:00 am
Senate Finance Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- ...violating taxpayer privacy laws and weaponizing the IRS
- against American taxpayers.
- by decimating taxpayer service and the debt spiral they're risking by destroying tax enforcement.
- Taxpayers. Thank you again, Dr.
- It's brutal on taxpayers; it's brutal on employers. In Vermont, we have a lot of small employers.
Keywords:
Michael Falkender, Deputy Secretary of the Treasury, IRS, taxpayer privacy, nomination process, committee hearing
Summary:
The committee convened to discuss critical issues surrounding the nomination of Michael Falkender for the position of Deputy Secretary of the Treasury. This meeting included a series of remarks from committee members who expressed divergent views on Falkender's qualifications and the implications of his appointment. Senator Wyden voiced strong opposition, arguing that Falkender represents harmful policies expected to be perpetuated under the current administration, especially concerning taxpayer privacy and IRS tactics. Meanwhile, other members defended Falkender, noting his extensive experience, including a commitment to transparency in government operations if confirmed.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th Regular
Appropriations - S/C on Articles VI, VII, & VIII Feb 26th, 2025 at 08:00 am
House Appropriations - S/C on Articles VI, VII, & VIII
Transcript Highlights:
- Fund.
- Recommendations include five billion dollars in additional funds to the Texas Energy Fund, bringing the
- 153 for all exceptional items funded last session.
- , and Energy Supply Chain Fund.
- actually doing a little bit better recently without these new heavily subsidized, very expensive taxpayer-funded
Keywords:
Texas Energy Fund, Public Utility Commission, taxpayer money, funding strategies, electricity regulation, public testimony, resource efficiency
Summary:
The meeting focused primarily on the public utility sector, with significant attention given to the Texas Energy Fund and its anticipated expansion. Discussions highlighted the funding strategies for public utility programs, with representatives questioning the necessity of further taxpayer investments in projects that have not proven their effectiveness. There was substantial debate over the management of resources and efficiency, particularly emphasizing the regulatory responsibilities of the Public Utility Commission. Member concerns were vocalized around the impact of increased spending on local taxpayers, and whether alternative measures could suffice without additional funding.