Rhode Island 2022 Regular Session

Rhode Island House Bill H8208

Introduced
5/4/22  
Refer
5/4/22  

Caption

Relating To Solemnization Of Marriages

Impact

The bill would modify existing laws concerning the solemnization of marriages by explicitly allowing a representative to officiate in a specific instance. By doing this, the legislation would clarify the roles and powers associated with the solemnization process, directly impacting how marriage ceremonies are authorized within Rhode Island. Furthermore, the bill's passage would provide assurance to those involved that their marriage ceremony is legitimate under state law, setting a precedent for similar legislative measures in the future.

Summary

House Bill H8208 is aimed at the solemnization of marriages in Rhode Island. Specifically, it authorizes the Honorable Mary Ann Shallcross Smith to officiate the marriage of Doreen S. Suprenard and Robert B. Kerfoot within the City of Pawtucket. This bill ultimately seeks to provide legal recognition for the marriage to occur on or about July 1, 2022, despite any contrary regulations in other general or special laws. It highlights the individual empowerment of a representative to perform this act, ensuring that the statute is clear about the authority bestowed upon them.

Sentiment

General sentiment around H8208 appears to be neutral, primarily focusing on the procedural aspect of authorizing a specific individual to solemnize a marriage. The text of the bill does not indicate any significant controversy or opposition, suggesting that it was largely uncontentious. As it addresses a specific case rather than overarching legislative reform, it may have fostered support from local constituents and those advocating for straightforward legal recognition of marriage.

Contention

While H8208 itself is straightforward, the potential for contention lies in how such legislation could affect broader discussions of marriage laws in the state. The bill is tied to specific individuals and circumstances, which are unlikely to provoke significant opposition. However, the mechanisms of who can officiate marriages and under what circumstances remain subjects of broader debate in legislative contexts. This bill exemplifies the ongoing dialogues around marriage laws and the authority of individuals to perform such ceremonies within legal frameworks.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.