Rhode Island House Bill H6386

Rhode Island 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/10/23
• Refer: 5/10/23
• Report Pass: 5/30/23
• Engrossed: 6/1/23
• Enrolled: 6/6/23
• Passed: 6/14/23

Caption

Authorizing The Stone Bridge Fire District To Issue General Obligation Bonds And/or Notes In An Amount Not To Exceed One Million Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars

Impact

If enacted, this bill will have a notable impact on local governance and its ability to manage financial resources effectively. The funds raised through the bonds will directly support the improvement and maintenance of the water system within the Stone Bridge Fire District in Tiverton. The ability to issue bonds without broad approval from governmental agencies allows the district to expedite necessary improvements in a more autonomous manner. This regulatory freedom is critical for addressing urgent water management needs that align with community safety and public health requirements.

Summary

House Bill 6386, introduced in the Rhode Island General Assembly, authorizes the Stone Bridge Fire District to issue general obligation bonds and/or notes up to a maximum of $1,250,000. This funding is specifically aimed at financing capital improvements to the district's water distribution system. The bill stipulates that the bonds must be repaid within a maximum of 40 years, with conditions regarding the sale and oversight of the bonds being outlined by the administrative board of the district. The act is significant in providing much-needed financial support for essential infrastructure upgrades.

Contention

While the bill primarily facilitates improvements in the water infrastructure, discussions surrounding the issuance of such bonds commonly raise concerns regarding fiscal responsibility and potential future financial burdens on local taxpayers. It is imperative for the district to transparently manage the use of funds and ensure accountability in the expenditure of the bond proceeds. Furthermore, constituents may express concerns about the long-term sustainability of financing methods that increase local debt, calling for a balanced consideration of infrastructure needs versus fiscal prudence.