Extends the current provisions relative to certain rights of innkeepers and eliminates the sunsetting of such sections thereby preserving the law as it currently exists.
Impact
The passing of H7065 will have a notable impact on state laws relevant to hotel management and guest rights. By codifying the rights of innkeepers to remove disruptive or unlawful guests, the bill could help improve the operational environment for hotels and safeguard other patrons and employees from potential harm. The changes would not only preserve the current legal framework but also reinforce the enforcement of guest conduct standards to protect the integrity of the hospitality industry in Rhode Island. The introduction of a clear guideline on refusal of service could simplify legal proceedings surrounding guest removals.
Summary
House Bill H7065 aims to extend existing provisions concerning the rights of innkeepers, particularly highlighting the grounds under which an innkeeper can eject or refuse service to guests. The bill specifically outlines various reasons for which a guest can be removed, such as refusing to pay for services, causing public disturbances, or violating hotel rules. By eliminating the sunsetting of these provisions, the law seeks to ensure that these rights remain in effect well beyond their initial period. The bill is intended to provide clarity and legal support to hotel operators regarding the management of their establishments and relationships with guests.
Sentiment
The sentiment around bill H7065 appears largely supportive among hotel industry representatives, who argue that extended rights for innkeepers enhance safety and security for both hotels and their guests. However, there could be concerns raised by civil rights advocates regarding possible misuse of these provisions leading to discrimination against certain individuals under the guise of enforcing hotel rules. Thus, while the bill is viewed positively by many in the hospitality sector, it has the potential to diverge into contentious discussions regarding guest treatment policies.
Contention
Some of the points of contention regarding H7065 could revolve around the definitions and interpretations of 'obvious intoxication' or 'public disturbance,' which may lead to disputes about enforcement practices. The language of the bill allows for subjective judgments by innkeepers, which could be contested by guests or advocacy groups. Furthermore, anti-discrimination clauses included in the bill might face scrutiny to ensure they are adequately enforced and prevent wrongful ejections based on race, gender, or other protected classifications, making the clarity and fairness of enforcement a potential debate point.
Authorizing The Town Of North Smithfield To Finance The Development And Construction Of A New Police Station Or The Renovation, Improvement, Alteration And Repair Of An Existing Building To Be Used As A Police Station, As Determined By The Town Council And The Furnishing And Equipping Thereof By The Issue Of Not More Than $18,000,000 Of Bonds And/or Notes Therefor
Authorizing The Town Of North Smithfield To Finance The Development And Construction Of A New Police Station Or The Renovation, Improvement, Alteration And Repair Of An Existing Building To Be Used As A Police Station, As Determined By The Town Council And The Furnishing And Equipping Thereof By The Issue Of Not More Than $18,000,000 Of Bonds And/or Notes Therefor
An Act to Move the Natural Areas Program from the Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry to the Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife and to Amend the Law Governing Administration of the Bureau of Resource Management Within the Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife