Requires that the division of planning create a checklist of environmental and energy issues that state construction projects which cost in excess of $10,000,000 would need to consider.
Impact
If enacted, this bill would lead to a more structured approach to environmental accountability in state construction projects. It would require that governmental bodies oversee these projects incorporate crucial environmental and energy preferences as part of their operational protocols. Additionally, the legislation signals a commitment to sustainability and resilience against climate change, thereby setting a precedent for future developments and amendments in construction regulations within the state.
Summary
House Bill H7620 proposes the establishment of a mandatory environmental and energy checklist for state construction projects with costs exceeding $10 million. This initiative is managed by the state division of planning, along with the divisions responsible for capital asset management and office of energy resources. The checklist aims to ensure that these large-scale projects consider significant issues such as coastal flooding, stormwater management, energy efficiency, and access to public transportation during their design and construction phases. Adopting this checklist is presented as a proactive measure to mitigate environmental impacts and enhance sustainability in state projects.
Contention
Although H7620 appears to carry a favorable prospect for enhancing construction standards, debates around its implementation may arise. Some concerns could focus on the potential increase in administrative burdens for state entities involved in large construction projects. Stakeholders may argue that while the checklist aims to assure environmental prudence, it could also lead to extended timelines and increased costs which may deter project initiation. Furthermore, discussions may center on the adequacy of assessments and whether the checklist sufficiently addresses all relevant environmental and energy factors.
Senate Resolution Respectfully Requesting That Rhode Island Energy Factor Into Consideration In Future Smart-charging Pilot Programs The Benefit-cost Assessment And Reduced Costs Associated With Using Energy During Off-peak Charging Times
House Resolution Respectfully Requesting That Rhode Island Energy Factor Into Consideration In Future Smart-charging Pilot Programs The Benefit-cost Assessment And Reduced Costs Associated With Using Energy During Off-peak Charging Times