JOINT RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A BI-PARTISAN PREPARATORY COMMISSION TO ASSEMBLE INFORMATION ON CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS IN PREPARATION FOR A VOTE BY THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS ON THE HOLDING OF A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XIV SECTION 2 OF THE RHODE ISLAND CONSTITUTION (This resolution would provide for a twelve (12) member bi-partisan commission to assemble information on constitutional questions in preparation for a vote by electors on holding a constitutional convention, and who would report back by September 1, 2024.)
The establishment of this commission aims to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the constitutional issues at hand before electors make their decision. The twelve-member commission, appointed from both legislative chambers and including public representatives, is tasked with compiling findings to present to state leadership and the general public. This initiative highlights the state's commitment to engaging citizens in the constitutional process and ensuring transparency as Rhode Island navigates important structural questions.
S3147, a joint resolution introduced by Senator Dawn M. Euer, seeks to form a bi-partisan preparatory commission to explore constitutional questions ahead of a vote on whether to hold a constitutional convention. This initiative responds to Article XIV, Section 2 of the Rhode Island Constitution, which mandates that a question regarding the holding of a constitutional convention be posed to voters during the upcoming general election on November 5, 2024. The resolution emphasizes the importance of gathering adequate information to inform voters regarding this significant constitutional process.
As with any significant constitutional change, there may be varying opinions on the necessity and implications of such a commission. Proponents argue that better-informed voters can lead to more meaningful engagement with the state's constitution, while critics might express concerns about the cost, efficacy, or potential political motivations behind establishing such a preparatory commission. Ultimately, the discussions leading up to the commission's findings may highlight differing perspectives on how to best handle constitutional questions in the present political climate.