South Dakota 2022 Regular Session

South Dakota House Bill HB1098

Introduced
1/21/22  
Refer
1/21/22  
Report Pass
2/1/22  
Engrossed
2/3/22  

Caption

Revise requirements for involvement in the medical cannabis program.

Impact

The revisions in HB 1098 affect state laws governing the medical cannabis industry significantly. They establish more stringent criteria for applicants, including requirements for local registrations and adherence to zoning laws, aiming to mitigate risks associated with the cannabis trade, such as criminal activity and unsafe practices. The proposed legislation aims to balance the growth of the medical cannabis market in South Dakota while addressing community concerns over public safety and regulatory compliance.

Summary

House Bill 1098 aims to revise the requirements for involvement in South Dakota's medical cannabis program. The bill introduces changes related to the registration process for medical cannabis establishments, including stricter regulations on who can apply and operate such businesses. Notably, individuals with felony convictions may only establish a cannabis business if ten years have passed since the completion of their sentence. These changes seek to ensure that only those with an acceptable background can participate in the program, which the legislature deems necessary for the integrity and security of the medical cannabis sector in the state.

Sentiment

Sentiment around the bill appears mixed. Proponents believe that higher entry standards for medical cannabis establishments will enhance the program's credibility and reduce potential misuse associated with the industry. Conversely, there are concerns about whether these revised regulations may limit access to the medical cannabis market for individuals who could provide beneficial health services based on their experience and local knowledge, thereby potentially stifling economic opportunities.

Contention

The bill has been met with some contention, particularly regarding its implications for applicants with past criminal records. Supporters argue that the safety and integrity of the cannabis program must take precedence, while opponents highlight that the ten-year requirement could unfairly exclude qualified individuals from participating in the industry. Furthermore, mandatory local registrations may create barriers for new businesses trying to enter a market that advocates believe should be more accessible.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

SD HB1134

Revise provisions related to medical cannabis for the protection of youth.

SD HB1102

Clarify and modify requirements related to the medical cannabis program.

SD HB1094

Revise provisions related to medical cannabis for the protection of youth.

SD HB1058

Revise the available forms of medical cannabis products.

SD HB1055

Modify medical cannabis certification requirements.

SD SB26

Revise the definition of practitioner for purposes of the medical cannabis program.

SD SB177

Revise provisions regarding medical cannabis.

SD SB1

Modify debilitating medical conditions for medical cannabis use.

SD SB18

Revise rulemaking authority related to medical cannabis.

SD SB5

Revise acceptable conduct related to the medical use of cannabis.

Similar Bills

CT HB05197

An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The Program Review And Investigations Committee Concerning The Postponement Of Program Termination Dates In The Sunset Law.

CA AB3061

State highways: property leases.

NV AB308

Revises provisions relating to cannabis establishment agents. (BDR 56-822)

CT SB01027

An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The Program Review And Investigations Committee Concerning The Postponement Of Program Termination Dates In The Sunset Law.

CA SB1089

Food and prescription access: grocery and pharmacy closures.

IL HB4222

VIDEO GAMING-CHANGE OF OWNERS

IL HB3729

VIDEO GAMING-VARIOUS

CA AB3209

Crimes: theft: retail theft restraining orders.