To protect elementary and secondary students from political indoctrination.
Impact
If enacted, HB1337 would amend existing educational guidelines in South Dakota, specifically targeting the curricula approved for use in public schools. By restricting teaching content related to these divisive concepts, the bill could significantly shift how history and social studies are taught, emphasizing a more uniform narrative that aligns with what the authors deem appropriate. This regulation aims to limit expenditures by state agencies and school districts on content that promotes these divisive concepts, calling for adhering to more foundational American values as outlined in the Declaration of Independence.
Summary
House Bill 1337 aims to protect elementary and secondary students in South Dakota from what is characterized as political indoctrination in educational settings. The bill defines 'divisive concepts' that include various notions related to race, religion, and national origin which the bill proposes should not be part of school curricula or training. The intent is to prevent what proponents view as bias in education that could foster division among students based on these attributes.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB1337 is sharply divided along political lines. Supporters, primarily from the Republican party, argue that the bill is a necessary measure to ensure that students receive an education free from indoctrination and bias. They view it as a way to uphold traditional American values. In contrast, opponents, including many Democrats and educational advocacy organizations, argue that the bill stifles critical thinking and academic freedom. They express concerns that limiting educational content could inhibit students' ability to engage with and understand complex historical and social issues.
Contention
The primary contention of HB1337 hinges on the definition of divisive concepts and the implications of banning such discussions. Critics are worried that such language could lead to a chilling effect on teaching and discussions around critical social issues, potentially neglecting important historical contexts. The debate encapsulates larger national conversations about educational content, freedom of speech in academic settings, and the role of government in regulating educational systems.
Provides relative to training with respect to certain concepts related to race and sex in elementary and secondary schools and postsecondary education institutions
Prohibits teaching of critical race theory in public schools; prohibits public school teachers from engaging in political, ideological, or religious advocacy in classroom.
Prohibits teaching of critical race theory in public schools; prohibits public school teachers from engaging in political, ideological, or religious advocacy in classroom.
Prohibits teaching of critical race theory in public schools; prohibits public school teachers from engaging in political, ideological, or religious advocacy in classroom.