Establish educational standards for the expanded practice of optometry.
Impact
The bill is expected to significantly impact state laws regarding the practice of optometry by expanding the powers and responsibilities of licensed optometrists. This expansion may lead to improved access to eye care services for residents, especially in rural areas where ophthalmologists are less available. Additionally, the bill establishes specific training and examination requirements that optometrists must meet before they can perform the newly authorized procedures, aiming to ensure patient safety and care standards.
Summary
Senate Bill 87 aims to establish new educational standards for the expanded practice of optometry in South Dakota. This legislation seeks to modify the current definition of optometry and expand the scope of procedures that optometrists are authorized to perform. Notably, it includes the authorization for optometrists to conduct various procedures such as laser treatments, debridement of corneal epithelium, and simple repairs of eyelid lacerations. These changes are designed to allow optometrists to provide a broader range of services, responding to an evolving healthcare landscape that increasingly acknowledges the role of optometrists in eye care.
Contention
While the bill garnered support from various optometric associations, some voices expressed concerns regarding the expansion of practice. Critics argue that allowing optometrists to perform advanced procedures traditionally reserved for ophthalmologists could lead to complications or safety issues for patients. There is also a worry that insufficient training might result in adverse patient outcomes, emphasizing the need for rigorous educational standards and regulatory oversight.
Voting_history
The voting history of SB87 shows a close split within the legislative body, reflecting the contentious nature of the bill. In a recent voting session, the bill was deferred to the 41st legislative day with a vote tally of 7 yeas and 6 nays, indicating a significant division of opinion among lawmakers regarding the implications of expanding optometric practices in the state.