Increase the daily maximum award for the alternative care program administered by the Unified Judicial System.
Impact
The implications of SB89 are significant as they propose enhancements to the existing structure of financial support provided to alternative care programs. By increasing the grant limits, the state recognizes the rising costs associated with such care and aims to ensure that these programs can continue to operate effectively. This financial adjustment is expected to bolster the capacity of nonprofit entities involved in delivering these essential services, thereby impacting the overall welfare of vulnerable populations in South Dakota. Moreover, by providing better support for recidivism reduction programs, it may contribute positively to public safety and community health.
Summary
Senate Bill 89 aims to increase the daily maximum award for the alternative care program managed by the Unified Judicial System of South Dakota. This program is designed to provide support to indigent adults by funding extended residential care that helps to reduce recidivism. The bill details that these grants are allocated specifically for room and board expenses for participants in the program, with the intention of easing the financial burden on both the care providers and the individuals receiving assistance. The revised maximum grant amount proposed by the bill is fifty dollars per day per resident.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding SB89 appears quite supportive, particularly among stakeholders involved in alternative care and social services. Advocates for the bill view it as a critical move to strengthen the resources available for those in need, arguing that better funding facilitates better care and long-term rehabilitation outcomes for individuals at risk of recidivism. Legislative discussions have highlighted a consensus on the importance of such programs, although there might be varying opinions on the extent of funding required or the mechanisms for accountability.
Contention
While there is broad support for SB89, some discussions may revolve around the implications of increased funding for alternative care programs, particularly concerning oversight, effectiveness, and potential long-term sustainability. Questions may arise about the management of awarded funds and how the increase in daily maximums will translate into actual care improvements. Furthermore, stakeholders may debate the balance required between supporting individual needs and ensuring that state resources are allocated efficiently across various social programs.
Require the Unified Judicial System to assemble a task force to address barriers to services for emerging adults involved in the justice system in South Dakota.
Create a pilot program in the Unified Judicial System for risk and lethality assessments for certain persons accused of assault or protection order violations.
Require the Unified Judicial System to assemble a task force to address the provision of legal services to indigent parties within the South Dakota court system and to declare an emergency.
To amend Section 12-17-81 of the Code of Alabama 1975, to further provide for the salary of all circuit clerks in the Unified Judicial System based on the pay plan adopted by the personnel system of the Unified Judicial System.
To amend Section 12-17-81 of the Code of Alabama 1975, to further provide for the salary of all circuit clerks in the Unified Judicial System based on the pay plan adopted by the personnel system of the Unified Judicial System.
Establish an enhanced penalty for probationers intentionally causing contact with bodily fluids or human waste with a Unified Judicial System employee.