South Dakota 2024 Regular Session

South Dakota House Bill HB1054

Introduced
1/9/24  
Refer
1/9/24  

Caption

Amend requirements for cosmetology apprenticeships.

Impact

The impact of HB 1054 is significant as it revises existing laws governing cosmetology education and apprenticeship structures in the state. By detailing the conditions under which apprenticeship licenses can be granted, the bill ensures a more standardized approach toward training and education in the cosmetology field. Furthermore, it allows apprentices the opportunity to transfer completed hours between different programs and institutions, making the process more flexible and accessible for those pursuing certifications in cosmetology and related fields.

Summary

House Bill 1054 seeks to amend the requirements for cosmetology apprenticeships in South Dakota. It introduces modifications related to the licensing of apprentice salons and sets forth new educational and operational standards for apprentices in the fields of cosmetology, esthetics, and nail technology. Among the proposed changes, the bill allows apprentice salons to oversee a maximum of eight apprentices at any given time and stipulates that apprentices must complete a specified number of hours in their respective practices under a licensed instructor's supervision.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment regarding HB 1054 appears to be cautiously optimistic among proponents who argue it enhances regulatory clarity and improves educational standards for aspiring cosmetology professionals. Supporters believe that by establishing clear guidelines and requirements, the bill will lead to a more skilled workforce equipped to meet industry standards. However, there might be apprehensions among some existing practitioners regarding the implications of the new regulations on their operations and the training they offer.

Contention

Notable points of contention within the discussions around HB 1054 suggest varying perspectives on how the changes would affect salon operations and apprenticeship realities. Critics of the modifications may voice concerns regarding the cap on apprentices per instructor, arguing it could limit access to training opportunities. Additionally, translating extensive educational requirements into practical training might pose challenges for both salon owners and aspiring cosmetologists, requiring careful consideration of implementation to ensure that it does not inadvertently create barriers to entry for new practitioners.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

SD HB1214

Amend requirements for a cosmetology apprenticeship.

SD HB1233

Amend requirements for a cosmetology apprenticeship.

NV AB225

Revises provisions relating to licensing of certain professions and occupations. (BDR 54-858)

SD HB1231

Repeal the board of barber examiners and cosmetology commission, and to create the cosmetology and barbering board, to provide a penalty, and to make an appropriation therefor.

UT SB0112

Cosmetology Licensing Amendments

IN HB1135

Cosmetology apprenticeships.

MI HB5786

Occupations: barbers; required hours of course study for licensure; modify. Amends secs. 1108 & 1110 of 1980 PA 299 (MCL 339.1108 & 339.1110).

OK HB2514

Professions and occupations; Cosmetology and Barbering Act; curriculum hours; apprenticeships; compensation; effective date.