South Dakota 2024 Regular Session

South Dakota House Bill HB1060

Introduced
1/9/24  
Refer
1/9/24  
Report Pass
2/15/24  
Engrossed
2/21/24  
Refer
2/22/24  
Report Pass
2/26/24  
Enrolled
2/27/24  

Caption

Revise certain provisions related to travel reimbursement.

Impact

If enacted, HB 1060 would directly affect the reimbursement rates for state officers traveling for official state business. Notably, the bill stipulates that the mileage reimbursement rate for using a privately owned vehicle can vary based on the type of vehicle and the distance of travel, which emphasizes the need for policy alignment with the US Internal Revenue Service standards. Furthermore, it addresses the reimbursement for lodging and meals, proposing maximum limits to ensure fiscal accountability and efficient governance.

Summary

House Bill 1060 focuses on updating and revising various provisions related to travel reimbursement for state employees and officials in South Dakota. The primary aim of the bill is to clarify compensation protocols, including reimbursement rates for mileage, lodging expenses, and allowances for meals while performing state duties. By establishing uniform policies, the bill seeks to ensure consistency in how travel-related costs are handled across various state departments and agencies.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 1060 appears to be favorable among legislative members, as indicated by the unanimous voting outcome (33-0) in the recent session. The clear delineation of reimbursement processes and rates is regarded as a beneficial move towards enhanced transparency and budget management within state operations. Such measures are welcomed in a context where budgeting for state expenses often draws scrutiny and demands accountability from the public and legislative bodies alike.

Contention

One point of contention that may arise during discussions of HB 1060 involves the specific reimbursement rates set for various types of travel. While the bill incorporates allowances intended to reduce fiscal burdens for state employees, debates may emerge regarding whether the proposed limits are adequate or too restrictive. Additional scrutiny may focus on how these changes would impact the ability of agencies with different budgets to accommodate their employees when working in the field, particularly in remote areas where travel can be more expensive.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB558

Property taxation: new construction exclusion: rain water capture system.

CA AB2163

San Gabriel Basin Water Quality Authority Act.

CA SB734

Property tax: possessory interests.

CA AB1791

Rent control: local ordinances: residential units.

CT SB01554

An Act Concerning The Elimination Of The Property Tax On Motor Vehicles And The Provision Of Reimbursement And Other Grants To Municipalities.

CA SB871

Property taxation: homeowners’, veterans’, and disabled veterans’ exemptions.

CA SB623

Property taxation: homeowners’, veterans’, and disabled veterans’ exemptions.

CT HB05015

An Act Concerning State Continuation Of Group Health Insurance Coverage, Appointments To Legislative Commissions, Property Tax Exemptions And The Effective Dates Of Bonds For Road Resurfacing.