Require members of the Legislature to attend a course on the federal and state constitutions.
Impact
The implementation of HB 1111 may significantly improve the understanding of constitutional principles among state legislators. By requiring members to undergo this education, the bill aims to foster a more informed legislative body, which could lead to more constitutionally sound decision-making. This requirement is envisioned to cultivate a baseline knowledge that all legislators will share, potentially enhancing the quality of legislative debates and policy-making processes.
Summary
House Bill 1111, introduced by Representative Perry, mandates that each member of the South Dakota Legislature must participate in a two-hour course covering the federal and state constitutions. This requirement applies to all newly elected or appointed members before they commence their first regular legislative session following a general election. The course content, timing, and instructor will be determined by the director of the Legislative Research Council, ensuring that the education is consistent and standardized for all legislators.
Contention
While the bill has the potential to increase the constitutional knowledge among elected officials, it may also raise concerns regarding forced educational requirements. Some legislators might view this mandate as unnecessary or an infringement on their autonomy, particularly if they feel they are already sufficiently informed about constitutional matters. Opposition may come from those who argue that existing knowledge and experience should suffice without the need for mandatory training, fearing it could lead to unnecessary bureaucracy or perceived patronization.
Voting_history
As of the last recorded action on January 22, 2024, HB 1111 was deferred to the 41st legislative day, with a voting outcome of 11 yeas and 2 nays. This initial support suggests some level of approval among legislators, but further discussions and considerations may arise as the bill progresses through the legislative process.
Require the secretary of state to determine if a legislatively proposed constitutional amendment complies with the single subject requirement and is not a constitutional revision.
Applying for a convention of states under Article V of the Constitution of the United States, to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and to limit the terms of office for federal officials and members of Congress.
Proposing and submitting to the electors at the next general election an amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, updating references to certain officeholders and persons.
Proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election an amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, requiring an intervening general election occur before an initiated constitutional amendment that is substantially similar to an initiated amendment that was previously voted on and rejected may be submitted to a vote of the electors.
Proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election, an amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, authorizing the state to impose work requirements on certain individuals who are eligible for expanded Medicaid.