South Dakota 2024 Regular Session

South Dakota Senate Bill SB43

Introduced
1/9/24  
Refer
1/9/24  
Report Pass
1/12/24  
Engrossed
1/22/24  
Refer
1/23/24  
Report Pass
2/15/24  
Enrolled
2/26/24  

Caption

Establish procedures for the imposition of fines and probation against medical cannabis establishments, increase the allowable fee for a medical cannabis establishment registration certificate, and direct the Department of Health to promulgate rules to increase the fee for a registration certificate.

Impact

The bill will have significant implications on the existing state laws surrounding medical cannabis. It mandates the Department of Health to promulgate new rules concerning registration, inspection, and compliance with medical cannabis regulations. The updated procedures will include the establishment of a scoring system for vetting applicants, ensuring that local government preferences and patient access considerations are factored into the evaluation process. The proposed increased fees for registration and streamlined application processes are expected to offset administrative costs while enhancing the overall regulation of medical cannabis in South Dakota.

Summary

Senate Bill 43 (SB43) is a legislative act aimed at establishing new procedures for fines and probation against medical cannabis establishments in South Dakota. The bill proposes to increase the allowable fee for registration certificates issued to medical cannabis establishments, thereby seeking to enhance the regulatory framework governing cannabis operations in the state. By doing so, the bill emphasizes the need for increased inspections and compliance measures to ensure that these establishments adhere to health and safety standards, thereby providing a safer environment for patients and communities.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding SB43 appears to be mixed. Proponents of the bill argue that it is a necessary step in strengthening the regulatory foundation of medical cannabis in the state. They believe stricter oversight and the imposition of penalties for non-compliance will lead to a more responsible industry that can safely serve patients. On the other hand, some critics express concerns regarding the increased fees and potential burdens placed on smaller operators within the cannabis industry, which may affect their ability to sustain their businesses while complying with the new requirements.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between ensuring patient safety and not overburdening cannabis operators with excessive fees and regulatory requirements. Discussions indicate a concern that high registration and renewal fees could act as a barrier to entry for new or smaller businesses. Additionally, the bill establishes penalties, including fines up to $10,000, which may be seen as aggressive by some stakeholders. The approach to regulating advertising and product labelling, including mandatory disclosures on product effects and allergens, adds another layer of complexity and debate on the appropriate level of regulation needed to protect consumers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB05197

An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The Program Review And Investigations Committee Concerning The Postponement Of Program Termination Dates In The Sunset Law.

CA AB3061

State highways: property leases.

NV AB308

Revises provisions relating to cannabis establishment agents. (BDR 56-822)

CT SB01027

An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The Program Review And Investigations Committee Concerning The Postponement Of Program Termination Dates In The Sunset Law.

CA SB1089

Food and prescription access: grocery and pharmacy closures.

IL HB4222

VIDEO GAMING-CHANGE OF OWNERS

IL HB3729

VIDEO GAMING-VARIOUS

CA AB3209

Crimes: theft: retail theft restraining orders.