Tennessee House Bill HB0232

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/13/23
• Refer: 1/21/23
• Refer: 3/6/23
• Chaptered: 4/18/23
• Passed: 4/18/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, Chapter 29 and Title 68, Chapter 211, Part 1, relative to the underground storage tanks and solid waste disposal control board.

Impact

The implications of HB 232 are significant for the management of environmental safety and regulatory compliance in Tennessee. By enforcing stricter attendance rules for board members, the bill aims to enhance the board's effectiveness in overseeing matters related to underground storage tanks and waste disposal. If passed, this could lead to improved regulatory oversight, potentially ensuring that environmental safety standards are upheld more rigorously. This change could also contribute to a more reliable governance structure within the board, where consistent participation is crucial for making informed decisions.

Summary

House Bill 232 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically targeting the governance and operation of the underground storage tanks and solid waste disposal control board. The bill proposes changes to the structure of the board, including adjustments to the rules regarding member attendance. One crucial amendment introduces a requirement that any voting member who misses more than fifty percent of scheduled meetings within a calendar year will be removed from their position. This change is intended to ensure active participation among board members and maintain operational efficiency.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be largely positive among the legislative members who supported it, viewing it as a necessary overhaul for the governance of an important regulatory body. The intent behind the amendments seems to resonate with lawmakers advocating for stronger environmental protections. However, there may be concerns from some groups regarding the possible implications for representation and participation among board members, especially if stringent removal criteria could lead to a less diverse set of voices within the board's proceedings.

Contention

One notable point of contention within the discussions surrounding HB 232 relates to the balance between ensuring board accountability and maintaining sufficient representation from various stakeholder groups. While proponents argue for the need for active and engaged members, critics may be concerned that strict attendance rules could disproportionately affect members who may face legitimate challenges in attending all meetings. The debate thus encapsulates a broader issue regarding governance structures and the efficacy of regulatory bodies in managing crucial environmental issues.