AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 8; Title 29; Title 33; Title 34; Title 56; Title 63; Title 68 and Title 71, relative to health care.
The Patient Rights Act is positioned to significantly impact healthcare providers and institutions by formally recognizing patient rights within the legal framework. It mandates that healthcare facilities must comply with a patient's directives, including the right to refuse treatment and the ability to transfer care. Furthermore, it places obligations on healthcare practitioners to provide timely access to medical records and ensures that patients are informed about treatment options, particularly those available under emergency use authorization. This act is designed to promote transparency and patient satisfaction, likely influencing how healthcare providers interact with patients.
House Bill 377, referred to as the 'Patient Rights Act', aims to enhance the rights of patients in healthcare settings across Tennessee. This legislation amends various sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated to establish comprehensive rights regarding medical treatment decisions, access to medical records, and the ability to appoint advocates. The intent of the bill is to ensure that patients receive competent medical care while maintaining respect for their rights to make informed decisions regarding their healthcare. Supporters see this act as a means to empower patients and protect their dignity in the face of healthcare challenges.
Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 377 appears largely positive among patient advocacy groups and supporters, who view it as a vital step forward in ensuring patients have a say in their medical care. However, some concerns have been raised about the implications for healthcare providers, particularly regarding potential increases in legal liability if rights are not upheld. This creates a polarized discussion where some fear it could burden providers while others emphasize the need for accountability and patient-centered care in legislative measures.
Notably, points of contention include concerns over the enforceability of certain rights, particularly in emergency situations where patient capacity may be compromised. Additionally, the bill could lead to challenges as healthcare facilities navigate compliance with the new regulations while managing the need for rapid decision-making in critical care scenarios. Such debates reflect broader societal discussions about patient autonomy versus the operational priorities of healthcare systems.