Tennessee House Bill HB1004

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/23
• Refer: 2/2/23
• Refer: 3/14/23
• Refer: 3/22/23
• Engrossed: 3/30/23
• Enrolled: 4/11/23
• Passed: 4/28/23
• Chaptered: 5/3/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 1; Title 4; Title 49; Title 62; Title 63; Title 68 and Title 70, relative to appointed members of state governmental entities.

Impact

The bill's enactment will have significant implications for the governance of state governmental entities, particularly in how appointments and removals are conducted. It aims to create a more structured approach to appointments, emphasizing the need for members to have demonstrable knowledge of the state procurement process. The adjustments in the bill not only standardize the appointment process but also emphasize diversity and representation in the advisory councils, reflecting a commitment to equitable governance that reflects the community's demographics.

Summary

House Bill 1004 aims to amend various sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated concerning the appointment and removal of members from state governmental entities. The bill establishes clear guidelines for the terms of service for appointed members, indicating that members will serve until their successors are duly appointed and qualified. This change seeks to reinforce continuity and governance within state entities, ensuring that appointed members remain in their roles throughout the entirety of their term unless removed by the appointing authority. Furthermore, the bill prohibits proxy voting among council members, ensuring that voting members are present for decision-making processes, which enhances accountability within the council's operations.

Sentiment

Reactions to HB 1004 appear mixed, with proponents lauding it as a beneficial reform that promotes clarity and accountability in appointments within state entities. Supporters argue that these changes are necessary for a more effective governance structure. However, there may be concerns regarding the restrictions on proxy voting, as this could be viewed as a limitation on flexibility for council members, particularly when scheduling conflicts arise, thereby potentially hindering deliberative efficiency.

Contention

A notable point of contention within the discussion of HB 1004 revolves around the balance between efficient governance and the nuances required for local representation. The emphasis on maintaining a robust advisory council appointment process is reportedly challenged by the complexities of ensuring that appointees reflect the community's diversity. Additionally, the prohibition on proxy voting, while aimed at ensuring accountability, raises questions about the inclusiveness of decision-making, particularly in instances where council members have legitimate absences.