Tennessee House Bill HB1747

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/24
• Refer: 1/11/24
• Refer: 1/29/24
• Chaptered: 3/19/24
• Passed: 3/19/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 3, Chapter 12; Title 4, Chapter 29; Title 4, Chapter 9; Title 36, Chapter 6, Part 2; Title 47; Title 56, Chapter 3, Part 9 and Title 66, Chapter 3, Part 3, relative to the Uniform Law Commission.

Impact

If enacted, the bill would fundamentally impact several areas of state law concerning the structure and operation of the Uniform Law Commission and other related governmental entities. By eliminating these organizations, the bill could influence how states adopt uniform laws across various legal domains. The timing of the termination suggests a significant restructuring of how Tennessee engages with uniform law initiatives, potentially affecting legislative procedures and collaboration with other states in law reform efforts.

Summary

House Bill 1747 aims to amend various sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated related to the Uniform Law Commission. The bill specifically proposes the termination of the Uniform Law Commission and other governmental entities created during the calendar year 2030 as of June 30, 2032. Additionally, the bill modifies references within the law to ensure the updated correct naming of the commission, reflecting a shift in legislative terminology from 'National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws' to 'Uniform Law Commission'. This change seeks to clarify legal texts and acknowledges the ongoing evolution of legal nomenclature in state governance.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 1747 appears to be supportive among certain legislative members who view the reorganization as a step toward more effective state governance. There may be concerns from some factions regarding the implications of dissolving such entities, particularly in the context of law uniformity and collaboration with other states. The division of opinions surrounding the bill underscores a balance between advocating for more streamlined operations and preserving essential collaborative structures in law-making.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential impacts of the bill on the future legislative landscape in Tennessee. Opponents might argue that the termination of the Uniform Law Commission could hinder the state's ability to adopt and implement laws that are consistent with those of other states, thereby complicating legal procedures and reducing uniformity. On the other hand, proponents may contend that this bill represents necessary modernization in the state's administrative structure, allowing for the removal of redundant entities and potentially enhancing efficiency in governance.