Tennessee House Bill HB1909

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/22/24
• Refer: 1/25/24
• Refer: 2/13/24
• Refer: 2/20/24
• Refer: 2/28/24
• Engrossed: 3/5/24
• Enrolled: 4/5/24
• Passed: 4/23/24
• Chaptered: 5/1/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 39 and Title 49, relative to self-defense.

Impact

The passage of HB1909 would create significant changes in how self-defense is approached on college campuses throughout Tennessee. It specifies certain conditions under which public colleges and universities cannot prohibit carrying non-lethal weapons, aiming to enhance individual rights to self-defense in typically vulnerable environments. However, institutions are still permitted to limit carrying these weapons in specific scenarios such as on pre-K-12 school grounds or buildings with armed security, maintaining some level of control over weapon presence on their properties.

Summary

House Bill 1909, also known as the 'Laken Riley Act of 2024', aims to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically in relation to self-defense laws. The bill seeks to allow adult individuals on college or university campuses to carry non-lethal weapons such as pepper spray, stun guns, and other electronic devices for self-defense purposes. The legislation is framed within the context of increasing safety on higher education campuses in Tennessee. By enabling individuals to carry these weapons, the bill seeks to empower them to defend themselves in potentially threatening situations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to lean favorably among proponents of self-defense rights, viewing it as a necessary measure for enhancing safety on college campuses. Supporters argue that it empowers students and staff to protect themselves amid rising concerns about campus safety. Conversely, critics may express concerns about the potential for increased incidents of violence or misuse of weapons, highlighting the need for a balance between safety and maintaining a conducive learning environment.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions around HB1909 revolve around the implications of allowing non-lethal weapons on campus. While supporters argue it is a critical step in ensuring safety, opponents may raise concerns regarding the ramifications of weapon presence in educational settings. The debate illustrates differing perspectives on personal safety, institutional responsibility, and the potential for legislative overreach into university governance and student welfare.