Tennessee House Bill HB2423

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/24
• Refer: 2/1/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 13, Chapter 7 and Title 67, relative to housing.

Impact

The implementation of HB2423 is expected to streamline the housing development process, making it easier for local governments to increase the availability of various housing types. This could lead to higher densities in urban areas, better alignment of housing development with transportation corridors, and more mixed-use developments that combine residential with commercial spaces. By effectively incentivizing local governments to adopt zoning reforms, the bill aims to facilitate a quicker response to the growing housing demand in Tennessee, combating the affordable housing crisis.

Summary

House Bill 2423 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Title 13 and Title 67, to support housing development through various zoning reforms. The bill encourages counties and municipalities to adopt specific zoning strategies designed to increase housing supply and housing density in targeted areas. Among the strategies encouraged by the bill are the allowance of duplexes and quadplexes on single-family zoned lots, the reduction or elimination of minimum lot sizes and parking requirements, and incentives for local governments to implement these reforms by offering a portion of revenues generated from property transactions.

Contention

While proponents of HB2423 argue it is a necessary measure to tackle the housing shortage and promote sustainable urban growth, there are concerns regarding the potential consequences of loosening zoning restrictions. Some critics fear that the bill may overlook community preferences, aesthetics, and environmental considerations associated with increased housing density. Local communities may feel that they lose control over their zoning laws, leading to unintended consequences such as overcrowding or changes to neighborhood character. The bill’s approach to zoning reform has spurred debate about local governance versus state intervention in housing policy.