Tennessee House Bill HB2788

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/24
• Refer: 2/5/24
• Refer: 2/13/24
• Refer: 2/21/24
• Chaptered: 3/19/24
• Passed: 3/19/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 9, Chapter 4, Part 2 and Title 37, relative to data sharing.

Impact

The introduction of HB 2788 is expected to enhance the collaboration among state agencies, thereby streamlining processes related to reporting requirements. Such synergy is crucial in the context of safeguarding children and ensuring that information flows seamlessly between entities responsible for child welfare. The amendments proposed could significantly impact how these agencies handle data, promote better compliance, and ultimately lead to more efficient case management in child protection scenarios.

Summary

House Bill 2788 aims to amend various sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated to facilitate data sharing among several agencies. Specifically, it allows the district attorneys general conference, the administrative office of the courts, children's advocacy centers, the department, and law enforcement agencies to establish data-sharing agreements. This bill seeks to improve compliance with reporting requirements under the specified sections while maintaining the confidentiality of the data shared, in line with existing laws regulating such information.

Sentiment

The general sentiment towards HB 2788 appears to be supportive, especially among those who recognize the necessity of inter-agency cooperation for effective child advocacy. The focus on maintaining data confidentiality is particularly reassuring to stakeholders concerned about privacy. Nonetheless, some cautious voices may express concern over how the data-sharing agreements will be implemented and monitored, emphasizing the importance of transparency and oversight to prevent misuse of sensitive information.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the balance between necessary data sharing among agencies and the privacy rights of individuals involved. While most discussions seem to favor the bill's intent, critics could argue about potential risks associated with increased data sharing. Ensuring that the laws governing the sharing of data remain robust will be essential to address these concerns, particularly in preserving the trusted relationship that exists between sensitive agencies and the communities they serve.