Tennessee Senate Bill SB1586

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/20/23
• Engrossed: 2/22/24
• Enrolled: 2/28/24
• Passed: 3/12/24
• Chaptered: 3/19/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 9, Chapter 4, Part 2 and Title 37, relative to data sharing.

Impact

If enacted, SB1586 will specifically allow these various agencies to share necessary information while maintaining the confidentiality of shared data in accordance with existing laws. This amendment is expected to streamline operations between these agencies and improve the effectiveness of responses to child welfare issues. By ensuring that data remains confidential, the bill aims to protect the privacy rights of individuals involved and adhere to established legal standards regarding sensitive information.

Summary

Senate Bill 1586 aims to amend sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated concerning data sharing among various state entities, particularly within the domains of law enforcement and child welfare. The bill facilitates the establishment of data sharing agreements among district attorneys general, the administrative office of the courts, children's advocacy centers, relevant departments, and law enforcement agencies. This provision is intended to enhance compliance with existing reporting requirements related to child welfare and other legal obligations.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB1586 appears supportive, particularly among those focused on improving inter-agency collaboration in child welfare and legal compliance. Stakeholders believe that facilitating data sharing will lead to more efficient handling of cases and ultimately improve outcomes for children and families involved in the system. However, potential concerns about privacy and data security might arise from critics who worry about the implications of increased data sharing.

Contention

While the sentiment largely favors the bill, points of contention might arise regarding the balance between necessary data sharing and the preservation of individual privacy rights. Critics may voice concerns about the adequacy of measures to safeguard the confidentiality of shared information and whether the provisions truly protect sensitive data from misuse. Additionally, there could be discussions about the scope of the agencies involved and the potential for unintended consequences in terms of data handling practices.