Tennessee Senate Bill SB0030

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/29/22
• Engrossed: 2/6/23
• Enrolled: 2/14/23
• Passed: 3/6/23
• Chaptered: 3/22/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, Chapter 29 and Title 8, Chapter 30, relative to the board of appeals for the department of human resources.

Impact

If enacted, SB 0030 would modify existing laws under Title 4, Chapter 29 and Title 8, Chapter 30 of the Tennessee Code. The revisions are expected to reorganize the functions of the appeals board, potentially altering how decisions are reviewed and appealed in the department of human resources. This may lead to changes in administrative procedures, impacting citizens who rely on the services provided by this department.

Summary

Senate Bill 0030 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically targeting the provisions concerning the department of human resources. The proposed changes focus on the board of appeals related to this department, which plays a critical role in hearing appeals from individuals affected by decisions made by the department. The bill seeks to streamline the processes and regulations regarding how these appeals are managed, ensuring more efficient outcomes for those involved in such cases.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB 0030 appeared to be predominantly positive, as indicated by the unanimous support reflected in the voting outcome. With 30 votes in favor and none opposed, the bill signifies a collaborative legislative approach to enhancing administrative efficiency and protecting the rights of those involved in the appeals process. Stakeholders involved with human resources and social services expressed optimism that this bill would lead to more timely resolutions for individuals and families navigating the appeals system.

Contention

While the bill received broad support, some members of the legislature raised concerns about the implications of reforming the board of appeals. Notably, there were discussions about the need to maintain sufficient oversight and consumer protections within the appeals process, ensuring that individuals still have access to fair hearings and just representations. Thus, although the sentiment is largely supportive, there are underlying considerations regarding the balance of authority and transparency in the decision-making processes of the department.