Tennessee Senate Bill SB0060

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/29/22
• Engrossed: 2/6/23
• Enrolled: 2/14/23
• Passed: 3/6/23
• Chaptered: 3/23/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, Chapter 29 and Title 43, Chapter 29, relative to the Tennessee corn promotion board.

Impact

If implemented, SB0060 will streamline the operational framework of the Tennessee Corn Promotion Board, thereby affecting how agricultural policies related to corn are managed at the state level. The changes in the code could lead to more targeted promotional activities and funding allocated to corn-related initiatives. Supporters of the bill anticipate that a more structured approach will benefit local corn farmers economically and promote innovation within the sector, contributing positively to the overall agricultural landscape of Tennessee.

Summary

Senate Bill 60 (SB0060) focuses on the establishment and amendment of regulations surrounding the Tennessee Corn Promotion Board. This bill seeks to amend Title 4, Chapter 29 and Title 43, Chapter 29 of the Tennessee Code Annotated to provide a clearer organizational structure and responsibilities of the board. The primary objective is to promote the interests and products of corn growers in Tennessee, enhancing support for the agricultural sector involved in corn production. The establishment of a dedicated board aims to improve coordination among corn farmers and promote their products more effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB0060 appears to be largely optimistic, with stakeholders in the agriculture sector expressing support for the measures that enhance the state's commitment to corn production. Proponents see this as a vital step toward bolstering the local economy through improved agricultural practices and marketing efforts. There seems to be a general agreement among legislators on the importance of supporting agricultural boards that directly contribute to the state's farming economy.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB0060 might include concerns over potential bureaucratic inefficiencies or the allocation of state funds to promotional campaigns. Some critics may argue that focusing on one specific crop, like corn, could divert resources from other agricultural sectors that also require state support. Additionally, discussions may arise regarding the accountability and transparency of the operations of the newly structured board.