Tennessee Senate Bill SB0086

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/23
• Engrossed: 2/13/23
• Enrolled: 4/3/23
• Passed: 4/17/23
• Chaptered: 4/25/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 10, Chapter 7, relative to public records.

Impact

The implications of SB 0086 on state law are significant as it reinforces the principle of equal access to public records. By preventing preferential treatment based on an individual's occupation, the bill seeks to promote transparency and accountability in government dealings. This aligns with broader legislative efforts across many states to enhance the public's access to information, albeit within the defined boundaries of non-discrimination among requesters. The bill is set to take effect immediately upon becoming law, underlining the urgency and importance of its provisions.

Summary

Senate Bill 0086 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Title 10, Chapter 7, which deals with public records. The primary purpose of this bill is to clarify that individuals do not have the right to expedited access to public records based on their profession or occupation. This provision is intended to ensure fair treatment for all requesters of public records, regardless of their association with certain professions that may typically warrant faster access to information.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding the passage of SB 0086 appears to be positive, particularly among advocates of transparency and accountability in public governance. The unanimous voting outcome (91 yeas and 0 nays) indicates strong support among legislators, suggesting that the bill is perceived as a necessary step toward ensuring equitable treatment in access to public records. However, while the sentiment is predominantly positive, there may be concerns from certain groups who may feel that the bill does not sufficiently recognize specific professional needs for expedited access to records.

Contention

Although SB 0086 passed without opposition, there are potential points of contention regarding its strict application. Critics could argue that the lack of provisions for expedited access may hinder the ability of professionals such as journalists or legal representatives who may need urgent access to information for time-sensitive matters. Such discussions may foster debates on the balance between maintaining fair access for all and addressing the nuances of specific professions that may require more immediate access to public records.