Tennessee Senate Bill SB0388

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 2-2-102 and Title 40, Chapter 29, relative to voting rights.

Impact

The bill is expected to significantly impact the framework of voting rights in Tennessee, especially for previously incarcerated individuals. By limiting disqualifications to the period of incarceration, parole, or probation, it aims to promote reintegration into society by enabling these individuals to participate in the electoral process. Additionally, it addresses concerns about disenfranchisement due to inability to pay monetary obligations, ensuring that economic factors do not further infringe upon an individual's right to vote.

Summary

Senate Bill 388 aims to amend existing statutes regarding voting rights in Tennessee. The bill primarily focuses on the voting eligibility of individuals convicted of infamous crimes, such as first-degree murder and aggravated rape. It proposes that individuals should only be rendered ineligible to vote while they are currently imprisoned, on parole, or on probation for such convictions. This change is anticipated to facilitate the restoration of voting rights and eliminate barriers that previously hindered individuals from regaining suffrage after completing their sentences.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 388 appears to be largely positive among advocates for criminal justice reform and voting rights. Proponents argue that this bill represents a crucial step towards fostering a more inclusive democratic process. However, there may be points of contention among those who oppose the easing of restrictions for individuals convicted of serious offenses, expressing concerns about the implications for public safety and the integrity of the electoral process.

Contention

Key points of contention include the definition of 'infamous crimes' and the implications of allowing individuals convicted of such crimes to vote. The list of offenses that permanently disqualify individuals from voting remains a topic of debate. Additionally, the mechanism for certificate issuance upon restoration of rights raises questions about bureaucratic processes and accessibility for eligible individuals, which some fear might still present hurdles despite the intended easing of restrictions.