Tennessee Senate Bill SB0727

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/27/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 40, relative to global positioning monitoring.

Impact

The bill would impact state laws by allowing magistrates to impose GPS monitoring on individuals accused of serious offenses against victims of domestic violence, particularly when the alleged incidents involve strangulation or threats of firearms. The intention is to enhance the safety of victims by ensuring that there is a trackable measure in place to protect them and ensure the appearance of the defendant at court hearings. By doing so, it aligns legal reforms with contemporary approaches to domestic violence intervention and victim safeguarding.

Summary

Senate Bill 727 (SB0727) aims to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 40, by introducing provisions related to global positioning monitoring systems (GPS) for defendants in cases involving domestic violence. The bill provides judges with the authority to order defendants to wear GPS devices when specific conditions are met, particularly in incidents involving domestic abuse or violations of protective orders. This legislative measure emphasizes the need for protective mechanisms for victims while ensuring that defendants are monitored for compliance with court mandates.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB0727 appears positive, especially among advocacy groups focused on domestic violence prevention and victim support. Proponents argue that the use of GPS monitoring can significantly increase the safety of victims and offer a sense of security during court proceedings. However, there are concerns from some critics regarding privacy implications for defendants, as well as the potential for systemic flaws in the implementation of such monitoring systems.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications of imposing GPS devices on defendants, as debates have arisen over the balance between victim protection and the rights of accused individuals. Critics are wary of the potential misuse of monitoring technology and emphasize the necessity for clear guidelines on how monitoring will be implemented and overseen. Furthermore, considerations about costs associated with the monitoring devices and who will bear these financial responsibilities could also create friction in discussions about the bill's overall viability.