Tennessee Senate Bill SB1761

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/12/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 5; Title 6; Title 7; Title 13 and Title 43, relative to the regulation of food production.

Impact

If enacted, SB1761 will directly impact zoning laws related to food production in residential areas. It permits the cultivation of fruits and vegetables and the keeping of up to six chickens or rabbits. However, it does allow for reasonable regulations aimed at maintaining sanitation, controlling odor and noise, and ensuring safety. This approach seeks to balance the rights of homeowners to produce food with the need for neighborhood standards regarding property upkeep and safety.

Summary

Senate Bill 1761 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated to regulate food production on single-family residential lots. The bill specifically prohibits counties and municipalities from adopting or enforcing regulations that would prevent homeowners from growing fruits and vegetables or keeping small livestock, such as a limited number of chickens and rabbits, on their properties. The intent of this bill is to promote urban agriculture and allow residents the freedom to engage in food production activities, enhancing self-sufficiency and sustainability within communities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1761 appears to be generally supportive among advocates of local food production and sustainability. Proponents argue that the ability to grow food and keep small livestock can foster community resilience and healthier lifestyles. Opponents, however, may express concerns about the potential for nuisance issues—such as noise or odor complaints—and the enforcement of reasonable regulations in densely populated areas. The legislation has ignited discussions about the balance between individual rights and community standards.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the limitations placed on local governments to impose further regulations beyond those allowed by the bill. Critics fear that these restrictions could undermine local efforts to maintain neighborhood aesthetics or address specific community concerns. The bill also opens up a broader debate about the role of state versus local control in managing land use and agricultural practices, with tensions arising particularly in urban settings where property sizes and residential densities vary significantly.