Tennessee Senate Bill SB1818

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 39, Chapter 17, Part 13, relative to possession of firearms.

Impact

The enactment of SB1818 could have far-reaching implications for the handling of firearm possession among those facing serious legal charges in Tennessee. Specifically, individuals who are indicted for felonies would be expressly prohibited from possessing firearms, thus aiming to reduce the risk of gun-related incidents perpetuated by those under indictment. This law is likely to affect many individuals currently poised to enter or already within the judicial system, establishing clearer boundaries around firearm access for those facing significant allegations. Furthermore, it seeks to reinforce the importance of responsible gun ownership while addressing public safety concerns associated with firearm access for potentially dangerous individuals.

Summary

Senate Bill 1818 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Title 39, Chapter 17, Part 13, which addresses firearm possession laws. The bill introduces a new subsection that criminalizes the possession of firearms or firearm ammunition by individuals who are under indictment for a crime that is punishable by imprisonment for one year or more. Those found in violation of this law would be committing a Class D felony, which is significant as it imposes serious legal consequences for a population that has previously been permitted to possess firearms without such restrictions. The intent behind this legislation appears to be increasing gun safety measures and reducing potential violence by preventing certain high-risk individuals from accessing firearms.

Contention

While SB1818 is framed as a public safety measure, it may also ignite debates regarding the balance between gun rights and legislative authority to impose restrictions based on indictment status. Opponents may argue that this creates an undue burden on individuals who are presumed innocent until proven guilty, effectively penalizing them before a conviction is reached. Additionally, the classification of a violation as a Class D felony could be seen as disproportionately harsh, raising questions about the fairness of imposing such serious repercussions for individuals who are not convicted. As the discussions around this bill unfold, it is anticipated that various stakeholders, including advocacy groups, legal experts, and lawmakers, will weigh in on these contentious aspects.