Tennessee Senate Bill SB1917

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/24
• Engrossed: 4/1/24
• Enrolled: 4/15/24
• Passed: 4/29/24
• Chaptered: 5/9/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 36, Chapter 3, relative to marriage.

Impact

The enactment of SB1917 is expected to have implications for how family relationships are defined within legal contexts in Tennessee. By recognizing lineal descendants, the law acknowledges a broader family structure which could affect inheritance rights, guardianship, and other legal considerations relating to family law. This could provide more inclusive recognition for individuals within lineal descendent categories, streamlining their rights within the marriage framework.

Summary

Senate Bill 1917 is designed to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 36, Chapter 3, focusing specifically on the definitions of familial relationships in the context of marriage. The key amendment substitutes the term 'child of a grandparent' with 'lineal descendant of a grandparent,' which broadens the scope of family relationships recognized under state marriage laws. This change is significant as it clarifies and potentially expands who may enter into certain familial legal arrangements in Tennessee.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1917 appears to be largely positive, as evidenced by the substantial support reflected in the voting outcomes. The bill passed with a majority of 75 votes in favor and only 2 against, indicating a strong consensus among lawmakers that the changes it proposes are necessary and beneficial. Supporters likely view it as a progressive step towards accommodating the evolving definitions of family in society.

Contention

While the bill has garnered significant bipartisan support, there may be underlying contentions regarding the implications of redefining familial relationships. Critics might raise concerns about how broadening the definition of lineal descendants could influence traditional marriage frameworks or custody issues. However, these points do not appear to have significantly hindered its passage, reflecting a general agreement on the need for clarity and inclusivity in family law.