Tennessee Senate Bill SB1976

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/24
• Engrossed: 2/15/24
• Enrolled: 2/23/24
• Passed: 3/11/24
• Chaptered: 3/19/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 55, Chapter 21, Part 1, relative to the Disabled Drivers Law of 1975.

Impact

If enacted, SB 1976 would modernize existing statutory language, thereby improving the clarity and functionality of the law concerning disabled drivers. It acknowledges that not all individuals who require a wheelchair are necessarily 'confined' to one, which can often be a misrepresentation of their mobility capacities. This amendment could impact how permits are issued and foster a more supportive environment for disabled individuals using wheelchairs, potentially removing barriers to their participation in driving.

Summary

Senate Bill 1976 aims to amend Tennessee's Disabled Drivers Law of 1975, specifically focusing on the language used in defining eligibility for disabled driving permits. The bill proposes to replace phrases that denote a complete confinement to a wheelchair with language that describes individuals who use a wheelchair due to a permanent incapacity for ambulation. This subtle yet significant change aims to broaden the understanding of disability, aligning it with contemporary views and potentially making it more inclusive for those with mobility challenges.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 1976 appears positive, as it emphasizes a more nuanced and empathetic approach to disability recognition. Advocates for the disabled community are likely to support the bill for its progressive stance, while the discussion about wording adjustment indicates a collective move towards inclusivity. However, specific concerns around how these changes will be implemented may arise during legislative discussions.

Contention

Despite the bill's positive reception, some debate might emerge concerning the precise language changes and their implications for implementation. Critics may argue that altering such terminology could foster confusion among law enforcement and regulatory bodies or alter the criteria for eligibility in unexpected ways. The bill's clear articulation of definitions is crucial to ensure that it serves its intended purpose without inadvertently disenfranchising certain individuals who genuinely need accommodations.