Tennessee Senate Bill SB0014

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/10/24
• Engrossed: 4/14/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 70, relative to wildlife resources.

Impact

The changes proposed in SB0014 reflect a significant shift in the legal landscape regarding wildlife-related crimes. By increasing fines and amending the designation of certain misdemeanors, the bill is likely to have a deterrent effect on wildlife poaching and illegal hunting activities. The alterations will not only standardize penalties for offenses but may also encourage better adherence to wildlife regulations. Additionally, it aligns penalties with contemporary enforcement efforts and the importance of protecting state wildlife resources.

Summary

Senate Bill 0014 (SB0014) aims to amend various sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated relating to wildlife resources. The bill seeks to adjust penalties, specifically fines associated with violations of wildlife laws. Notably, it proposes to raise maximum fines for several offenses to $500, which could impact individuals charged under these statutes. This amendment intends to unify the treatment of offenses under wildlife laws, enhancing the enforcement framework for wildlife protection in Tennessee.

Contention

However, the amendments do present notable points of contention. Critics may argue that increasing fines could disproportionately impact lower-income individuals or small business owners involved in activities related to wildlife, such as fishing or hunting. There is a concern that these changes could lead to over-policing of certain communities. As stakeholders analyze the implications of SB0014, discussions may arise around the effectiveness versus the fairness of increased penalties, prompting debates about the accessibility of wildlife resources.

Further_details

Furthermore, the bill specifies various sections of the Tennessee Code that will be affected, facilitating clarity for law enforcement and individuals. For example, the sentencing structure regarding violations for failing to adhere to revocation orders, or the penalties for removing wildlife from another's land, will be distinctly laid out. This precision may help in reducing ambiguity in legal interpretations of wildlife laws, although the debate over the new fine structure continues.