Tennessee House Bill HB0024

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/5/24
• Refer: 1/16/25
• Refer: 3/26/25
• Refer: 4/1/25
• Refer: 4/17/25
• Refer: 4/21/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 70, relative to wildlife resources.

Impact

The proposed amendments would significantly standardize the penalties associated with wildlife offenses in Tennessee. By increasing the maximum fines and altering classifications of misdemeanors, the bill aims to enhance conservation efforts by deterring illegal wildlife activities. The changes could result in stricter enforcement of wildlife laws, impacting both recreational and professional interactions with wildlife resources across the state.

Summary

House Bill 0024 aims to amend various sections of Tennessee Code Annotated related to wildlife resources. The primary change involves adjustments to fines associated with violations of wildlife laws, specifically altering the penalties for certain misdemeanors to a maximum of $500. This bill not only modifies the financial implications of certain violations but also sets a minimum sentencing structure for specific offenses involving wildlife, such as the illegal removal of wild animals or birds from private property.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB0024 appears to be cautiously supportive among conservationists and legislators advocating for wildlife protection. They argue that increasing penalties is necessary for the effective enforcement of wildlife laws and ensures accountability. However, there remains a concern among some stakeholders about the potential impact on small hunters and fishers who may unintentionally violate these laws due to lack of knowledge or awareness.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions about the fairness of increasing penalties, especially for smaller offenses that may not significantly harm wildlife resources. Some stakeholders argue that while conservation is important, the state should also consider educational initiatives aimed at preventing violations before imposing stricter penalties. This highlights a broader debate on balancing effective wildlife protection with equitable regulations for the public.