Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB1055

Filed
 
Out of House Committee
4/23/09  
Voted on by House
5/17/09  
Out of Senate Committee
5/22/09  
Voted on by Senate
5/27/09  
Governor Action
6/19/09  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Enrolled
5/28/09  

Caption

Relating to the procedure for submitting certain plans and specifications of buildings or facilities for the purpose of eliminating architectural barriers encountered by persons with disabilities.

Impact

The implications of HB 1055 on state laws focus on improving access for individuals with disabilities. By establishing a defined timeframe for submissions, the bill aims to reduce delays and barriers within the construction approval process. This could encourage developers and state agencies to prioritize accessibility in building design, fostering a more inclusive environment for people with disabilities. As such, communities may experience an increase in accessible public spaces, effectively aligning with the principles of equality and universal design.

Summary

House Bill 1055 aims to enhance the accessibility of buildings and facilities for persons with disabilities by modifying existing procedures related to the submission of architectural plans and specifications. Specifically, it amends Section 469.102(b) of the Government Code to stipulate that the submission of plans and specifications must occur no later than the 20th day after their issuance, promoting a clearer timeline in the planning process. This legislative change is significant as it intends to streamline the compliance process for construction projects that must adhere to accessibility standards.

Contention

While the bill's overall intent is to benefit individuals with disabilities, there may be concerns regarding the implementation of the new submission timeline. Stakeholders, including architects, builders, and local governments, might express reservations about their ability to meet the new deadlines, particularly in regions with varying resources and levels of expertise in accessibility modifications. This could lead to debates about the adequacy of timeframes set forth for compliance and the potential impact on local building practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.