Texas House Bill HB1596

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 3/25/09
• Voted on by House: 5/17/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/22/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/27/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/28/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the creation of the Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District No. 204; providing authority to impose a tax and issue bonds; granting a limited power of eminent domain.

Impact

The bill modifies existing state laws by allowing an independent structure for local governance through the municipal utility district. This legislative change grants the district the ability to collect revenue through taxation specifically for the maintenance and development of local infrastructure. This move is expected to streamline projects and provide funding mechanisms not previously available under other local government structures. However, the newly granted powers come with limitations on the use of eminent domain, ensuring that the district cannot extend its powers beyond its boundaries for acquiring necessary land or easements for its projects.

Summary

House Bill 1596 proposes the establishment of the Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District No. 204. This bill empowers the newly created district with the authority to impose taxes and issue bonds necessary for funding various infrastructural projects, such as roads and drainage improvements. The bill outlines the governance structure of the district, with a board of directors consisting of five elected members who will oversee operations and make necessary financial decisions. The creation of this district will serve a public purpose, enhancing local infrastructure to accommodate growing populations and facilitate development in the region.

Contention

While the bill is primarily seen as a positive step towards enhancing infrastructure in Fort Bend County, it raises questions in terms of transparency and accountability. Critics may argue that such a district could potentially operate without sufficient oversight regarding the taxation and spending of public funds. Additionally, the delegation of powers, especially the limited use of eminent domain and the ability to impose taxes without direct voter approval for operational bonds, may raise concerns among residents about how these powers will ultimately affect them and their properties.